Student Report on Reading Group for “Censoring ‘Rainbow’ in China”

By Yaxuan Wang, Class of 2027

On Friday, February 14, 2025, DKU faculty, staff, and students gathered for our first reading group session, which focused on the article “Censoring ‘Rainbow’ in China” by Jamie J. Zhao. We were excited to welcome both returning participants and new faces, including several first-year students.

The session began with an introduction by Professor Zhenjie Weng, who outlined the article’s main themes. The article discusses the censorship of LGBTQ content in Chinese media. Scenes featuring gay romance and LGBT pride symbols were cut, reflecting China’s complex stance on LGBTQ rights, particularly in its media. Professor Weng also introduced the broader context of LGBTQ censorship in China, including state-enforced regulations and the struggles faced by LGBTQ individuals and communities in the country.

Following the introduction, participants engaged in a discussion on the different media censorship policies across various countries, especially with regard to LGBTQ representation. The conversation emphasized the fluid nature of these policies, particularly in China, where censorship practices have shifted over time yet remain influenced by political and ideological factors.

A key point of discussion was the role of Hunan TV, a Chinese media company that, despite its censorship of certain LGBTQ content, has been known for featuring LGBTQ celebrities on its shows in recent years. For example, the 2018 participation of openly queer artist Adam Lambert in the Chinese singing competition Singer was examined as an interesting case of global LGBTQ representation being commercialized for entertainment purposes, despite the Chinese government’s more conservative stance on LGBTQ issues.

Participants also discussed the cultural tensions surrounding LGBTQ representation in China, particularly in relation to how Chinese media balances commercial interests with political control. The group also broadened the conversation to include public opinions on LGBTQ issues in China, referencing popular Chinese television shows like The Untamed (陈情令) and idol-genre dramas (养成系), which often depict LGBTQ themes but avoid directly addressing LGBTQ identities. These shows provide nuanced portrayals of gender and sexuality, but often understate or erase political and social implications, raising questions about how media in China presents LGBTQ culture in a non-threatening, marketable way.

The session concluded with a lively group activity where participants brainstormed strategies for creating more inclusive spaces in Chinese media and education. The activity allowed participants to reflect on the complexities of LGBTQ representation in China, particularly in light of the political climate and the evolving relationship between global pop culture and state censorship.

The event was organized by Dr. Zhenjie Weng, Assistant Professor of English Language Education, and Dr. Yanan Zhao, Senior Lecturer of English for Academic Purposes, from the Language and Culture Center, and was sponsored by the Humanities Research Center. Student worker Yaxuan Wang also contributed to the success of the event. Our next reading group session will be held on March 28, 2025.

“UNBOUND: Flow and Resistance” Exhibit Launch

Date: December 3rd
Time: 5:30 pm – 7:30 pm
LocationHUM Space (AB1075A)

We are excited to announce the upcoming exhibit hosted by the Humanities Research Center: UNBOUND: Flow and Resistance! Join us for the launch on December 3rd at 5:30 PM at HUM Space (AB1075A).

This exhibit features the thought-provoking film The Stain: Unshaming Menstruation (), which explores themes of body, shame, and resistance in a powerful and engaging way. Light refreshments and drinks will be provided.

Don’t miss out on this inspiring event! We look forward to seeing you there.

Event Report: Lecture on “Western Feminism and Its Analytics in Neoliberal Times”

On November 7th 2024 Professor Anna Krylova delivered a zoom lecture for the Gender Studies Lab titled “Western Feminism and Its Analytics in Neoliberal Times.” Prof. Krylova is a professor of History and Gender, Feminist and Sexuality Studies at Duke University. She is a specialist on the history of gender and feminism, with a particular emphasis on the Soviet Union. She is author of the award winning book, Soviet Women in Combat: A History of Violence on the Eastern Front. Around 25 faculty and students were present, both in person and online.

 

Prof. Krylova’s lecture was based upon the current book she is writing, tentatively titled History-Writing or Sleepwalking Through History in Neoliberal Times. The lecture assessed the ways that “post-structural” forms of thinking, despite having many generative elements, were disarming both for feminist activism and feminist history writing in the west. As Krylova explained it, post-structuralism, broadly speaking, was politically disabling for feminism because it privileged discourse over structure, micro-level analysis over analysis of larger formations of economic power. As a result, post-structuralism focused more on localized and “everyday” forms of individual resistance and neglected, or even condescended towards, organized forms of resistance to power.  This neglect, she argued, ultimately aligned post-structuralism, perhaps unwittingly, with western economic neo-liberalism and Cold War political imperatives. Krylova made her case by focusing particularly on James Scott’s highly influential work Weapons of the Weak as a case study. Scott is widely known for showing the ways peasants in Southeast Asia engaged in everyday forms of spontaneous, often individual resistance in order to survive and determine their own lives. Krylova provocatively suggested that Scott’s work overrates the effectiveness of everyday resistance while ignoring that “organized forms of power” requires “organized forms of resistance.”  For Scott, “organized forms of resistance” are themselves repressive and thus his own framework of thought is a dissuasion from systematically organizing against structural injustices such as patriarchy.

 

The lectured lasted for roughly 35 minutes and was concluded with 40 minutes of discussion between Krylova and her audience. Questions by faculty and students were various. One faculty questioner asked about the recent elections and whether the Democrats had made a mistake by emphasizing identity politics over class-based issues. Another faculty questioner noted that not all aspects of Scott’s work were disarming, but truly generative, while yet student questioner noted (correctly) that Scott had worked for the CIA, and was a thinker devoted to “counterinsurgency” and not to emancipation. A number of other questions were also asked as part of the discussion.

Lecture: Western Feminism and Its Analytics in Neoliberal Times

Date: Thursday, November 7th
Time: 11 AM BJT
Zoom ID: 261 330 4845
Location: IB 1047

Lecture Overview:
The talk will explore how Western Feminist theorists and social scientists have moved away from the Marxist tradition, particularly at the turn of the century, just when Marxist intellectuals began critically examining the relationship between various late 20th-century post-isms (poststructuralism, post-industrialism, postmodernism) and the rise of neoliberalism. This shift has led to a focus on micro-level perseverance and struggles of the underprivileged, moving away from larger structures of domination and exploitation.

Krylova will discuss how these changes have de-scaled and de-radicalized key categories like power, resistance, and agency, with lasting consequences on feminist scholarship.

About the Speaker:
Anna Krylova is an expert in historical and social theory, gender theory, and Marxism, with a focus on modern Russia and feminist theory. She is the author of Soviet Women in Combat: A History of Violence on the Eastern Front, which won the 2011 AHA Herbert Baxter Adams Prize. Her current book project, History-Writing or Sleepwalking Through History in Neoliberal Times, reexamines American historians’ engagement with poststructuralism.

Don’t miss this opportunity to engage with cutting-edge feminist theory and its intersections with Marxist thought!

GENDER + COMMUNITY BUILDING  

Join us for a thought-provoking discussion on Gender and Community Building hosted by HRC GENDER STUDIES LAB. Our panelists will delve into topics surrounding gender dynamics, inclusivity, and community-building efforts.

Date: Tuesday, October 22, 2024
Time: 6:00 PM
Venue: The Water Pavilion
Dinner will be provided!

Panelists:

  • Professor Yeshim Iqbal
  • Professor Andrew Wortham

RSVP by October 21, 2024

Reading Group: “Embracing Diversity: Developing Cultural Competence for Inclusive Education”

Reading Group: “Embracing Diversity: Developing Cultural Competence for Inclusive Education”

Location: AB3107 (3C)
Date & Time: Oct. 11th, 12:00–1:00 PM

About the Event:
Diversity, Equity, Inclusiveness, and Justice (DEIJ) are vital topics in academia. While these issues are widely discussed, putting them into practice remains a challenge for educators striving to improve their teaching methods. It is essential to ensure educational materials and curricula are inclusive, relevant, and engaging for all students, while fostering safe and welcoming learning environments.

Lunch will be provided!

How to Sign Up?
Scan the QR code to access the reading materials.

For questions, please contact:
Prof. Weng: zhenjie.weng@dukekunshan.edu.cn
Prof. Zhao: yanan.zhao@dukekunshan.edu.cn

Student Report for “Gender + Labor” Event

By Xinyu Liao, Class of 2027

On September 24, 2024, a thought-provoking panel discussion focusing on the intersection of gender and labor was held by the HRC’s Gender Studies Lab in the Water Pavilion. The panel featured distinguished professors, including Sajida Tuxun, who researches female waitresses and caregivers; Nellie Chu, who studies gender in the context of fast fashion and migrant labor; and Jaehee Choi, who examines social policy and labor market dynamics. Together, they shared insights on the experiences of women in the service industry and the broader implications of social norms and policies. About 40 students and 10 faculty members attended.

 

Professor Sajida Tuxun opened the discussion by addressing the emotional labor expected of female waitresses, emphasizing the challenges of representation in a male-dominated workplace. She highlighted the unique regional characteristics of caregivers and the impact of high mobility and instability on their experiences, noting that current policies significantly shape working conditions for women in these roles. This foundation set the stage for a deeper exploration of gender dynamics in the workplace.

 

Building on Professor Tuxun’s insights, Professor Nellie Chu elaborated on how gender divisions influence access to private spaces and field sites. She discussed the subtleties of gendered language in the workplace, particularly the reluctance of women to publicly claim authority, which reinforces traditional gender roles. She examined the distinction between “work” and “labor,” pointing out how much of women’s labor remains invisible and unrecognized, particularly in wage relations. Her contributions underscored the pervasive challenges women face in asserting their identities and roles within professional settings.

 

Transitioning to a broader context, Professor Jaehee Choi contributed by discussing the “M-shaped curve” labor force participation of Korean and Japanese women, characterized by declines in employment after childbirth and subsequent increases as children grow older. She then discussed a recent South Korean policy to improve the low fertility rate, in which the government provided monetary compensation to households for their childbirth. However, researchers found that parents spent it to invest in their children’s private education rather than basic child-rearing expenses as initially intended. This analysis highlighted the highly competitive Korean society that may deter childbearing among married couples and emphasized the need for systemic changes to support working families.

 

The conversation then shifted back to the experiences of women in the service industry, with Professor Tuxun highlighting the early pregnancies of many young migrant waitresses. These early pregnancies often lead to conflicts between work and familial responsibilities, complicating their professional trajectories. She contrasted high-end caregivers, who receive better pay and have different requirements compared to traditional “保姆” (nannies), reflecting on the global dynamics of domestic labor. This discussion illuminated the nuanced realities faced by women navigating both professional and personal demands.

 

In closing, Professor Chu emphasized the importance of understanding what constitutes a reproductive body within the labor context. She discussed the complexities of bargaining in workplace relationships, illustrating how women’s labor often goes unrecognized despite being crucial to family and societal structures. This final point reinforced the need for a comprehensive understanding of women’s contributions to both the economy and the home, calling for greater recognition and support in addressing gender disparities.

 

To conclude, the panel provided a comprehensive overview of the multifaceted challenges women face in the labor market, revealing the need for policies that recognize and address gender disparities. The insights shared by the panelists sparked meaningful dialogue about the future of women’s labor in an evolving economic landscape, concluding with a call for further research and advocacy aimed at improving the working conditions and recognition of women in various sectors.

Student Report on the Workshop: “Casual Queering: Playing Chinese Gay Dating Apps Wrong”

By Nathan Franco, Class of 2028

On September 11th 2024, the HRC’s Gender Studies Lab welcomed visiting Assistant Professor of Cultural Anthropology Andrew Wortham to speak about his research project titled  “Casual Queering: Playing Chinese Gay Dating Apps Wrong.” About 35 students and ten faculty members attended.

 

Professor Wortham began by introducing various queer terms and analytical thinking along with a little description of his past venture(s) in Kunming, where he had the chance to study gay dating apps like “HeeSay,” previously known as “Blued.” The application “Blued” was usually downloaded by queer individuals with the “hard core” goals of finding romantic, sexual, or platonic relationships, however, as Professor Wortham showed, the people behind the scenes who worked for “Blued” had different goals, namely to encourage “at risk” individuals to get tested for HIV/Aids (Blued, like other dating apps, have a connection with the Centers for Disease Control).

Professor Wortham further discussed having worked “hand-in-hand” with one exceptional Kunming-based employee who constantly persuaded at-risk individuals to come to his office and get tested by using a more masculine or feminine way of communication in order to accomplish his “hard-core” goal.

Apart from these “hard core” goals, Professor Wortham established the term “playing” in context to gay dating apps.  Rather than viewing gay dating apps through an absolute (i.e. “hard core”) lens of finding a partner or for sexual engagement(s), the worker in Kunming used gay dating applications in the same manner as if he were playing a game. It did not have to be serious, so his conversations with users were typically mellow, dramatic, satire-filled, and comedic (“low stakes”). Users with their goals in mind usually kept the conversation going to fulfill time, reliving the stress and anxiety the app may have caused (through “play”).

 

However, entering some of these apps with romantic and sexual goals also comes with “normativity and discontent,” which can cause stress and make users want to uninstall the app. But in the end, they may find themselves reinstalling such apps because, as  Wortham explains, “play” in these interactions that are not purely sexual results in users deciding to interact again.

 

Professor Wortham describes casual queering as “[p]laying hard-core, normative dating app goals in a way that is not (at least temporarily) about accomplishing the goal, but instead joyfully filling time.” This means rather than using queer applications for the” hard-core” goal of finding a romantic or sexual partner; users are using them in the “wrong” way to engage in low-risk, fun conversations.

 

During the last 15 minutes, there was a Q&A session with Professor Wortham and the audience. Some of the questions asked were:

 

Q1: Is the HIV/AIDs status of a person posted on their profile?

A1: Yes, in some apps, you can opt-in to show your status and when you were tested. But this can come with a lot of problems because some people who are HIV+ would be unlikely to post their status visible because of discrimination and alienation.

 

Q2: After working at these queer app companies, how did workers get the right at-risk people to get tested?

A2: This is normally done through a manner of trustworthiness. People who were there and were willing to talk eventually led to a causal relationship, which led to getting tested.

 

Q3: Why are people at risk unwilling to be tested? What about the new 7-day drug that could prevent HIV?

A3: Some people are terrified about getting a positive result. There is a lot of stigmata/false information about how HIV is spread in addition to social isolation and the chance of being outed, which is why these companies encouraged people to speak with their families and friends, even going as far as providing a script.

 

Regarding the drug, as this is a new drug, many people, especially in rural areas, do not know that this drug exists. While some may fear being seen taking the drug or having the drug. Resulting in them not even getting the drug in the first place.

 

Q4: How is “play” different from flirting?

A4: “Play” often goes together with wasting time when you are bored. For example, one person known for being exceptional was contacted (by a queer app employee) in a playful manner, in which the whole office ended up playing a “game” in were other workers would share ideas of what to text back. There is always potential for conversations to become casual and playful.

“GENDER+ LABOR” Discussion Panel

We are thrilled to invite you to an insightful discussion on gender and labor, featuring a distinguished panel of professors who will share their expertise and perspectives on this important topic.

Date: Tuesday, 09/24
Time: 6:00 – 7:15 PM
Location: The Water Pavilion (Faculty discussions followed by Q&A)

Panelists:

    • Professor Jaehee Choi
    • Professor Nellie Chu
    • Professor Sajida Tuxun

The Gender+ Talk series delves into the intersections of gender with a variety of topics, offering rich discussions hosted by the HRC Gender Studies Lab. This series highlights DKU faculty whose research or teaching engages with gender issues. Past discussions have covered themes such as Gender+Language, Gender+Feminism, Gender+Household, and Gender+Mind.

This is a fantastic opportunity to explore critical issues at the intersection of gender and labor. We look forward to your participation!

Please RSVP to confirm your attendance. Dinner will be provided!

GSL Faculty-Student Research Grants Call

The Gender Studies Lab invites applications for AY 2024-2025 funding (up to $500 USD) for new faculty-student research projects on topics related to gender, sexuality, queer theory, or feminism. The applications may be submitted either by the faculty member or the student(s) but must involve some sort of faculty-student collaboration. This could entail a collaborative faculty-student project but also includes faculty working with student research assistants, student projects that have a faculty advisor, and students working on their Signature Work projects with their mentors.

This grant is intended to help develop new projects that have not yet received funding elsewhere. Funds may be used for any research-related expenses, including books, travel and accommodation expenses, interview or survey compensation, research assistant stipend, purchase of or subscription to relevant research resources and software, etc. Please note that receipts must be submitted for reimbursement by June 25, 2025, and assuming they have not graduated, the student awardees will be expected to present their work at a GSI research workshop in fall 2025.

If the research projects involve human participants, students must begin research activities only after their IRB proposal has been approved. Please note that research expenses can be reimbursed only after students have submitted proof of IRB approval.

The application should be a 1-2 page document that includes the following:

  • The members of the research team (including position and division for faculty and year and major/intended major for students)
  • Project title
  • A brief abstract (less than 200 words)
  • A brief description of the type of faculty-student collaboration you envision
  • A brief statement of how your project addresses issues related to gender, sexualities, or feminism
  • A brief budget

Applications are due by September 30. Please email your applications to GSI co-lead Jesse Olsavsky (jesse.olsavsky@dukekunshan.edu.cn).