The Blind Leading the Blind

Alex is working this summer at Hollaback.  By collecting women and LGBTQ folks’ stories and pictures in a safe and share-able way with its mobile phone applications, Hollaback! is creating a crowd-sourced initiative to end street harassment.

This week we asked students to reflect on their own “gender socialization” growing up; how did they learn what it meant to be a girl or a boy?  And how did that connect to the ideas they read about in Jessica Taft’s book Rebel Girls: Youth Activism and Social Change Across the Americas.  Taft argues that while many programs focus on girls’ “empowerment,” which she suggests mostly prepares them to fit in to the way the world is today, she supports a focus on girls’ “activism,” which helps them find ways to make a real difference in the world.

One distinct memory I have of my father during my childhood was his constant desire to berate me with what it meant to be a “man.” Usually he was using it to accuse me of not being responsible, or timely, or focused, or honest or anything that he wanted me to be, that, of course, didn’t really have anything to do with being a man.  There are plenty of irresponsible, impolite, dishonest, and simply unpleasant men in the world; it seems most of them have been elected to our federal government but I digress.  “When you become a man, you’ll understand.” If he only knew.

I’ve always thought of socialization around gender to be very implicit, but the fact is, it wasn’t.  It was rarely audibly articulated, but it was, on the other hand, quite explicit.  In my case, much of what I learned about gender roles growing up was a product of my parents’ attempts to bring my siblings and me up in the Christian faith. I can definitely see, now, that implicit in their moral and religious agendas were very defined and limited gender roles.  My mother was never loud, rarely argued with my father or even disagreed, always cooked and cleaned the house, did most of the childcare, and later on dealt with most of our issues surrounding school.  My father on the other hand, always gave his critiques of dinner though he never made any effort to make it himself, ordered my siblings and me around as far as yard and school work, taught us to read and write and play instruments, while always managing to keep us fearfully obedient with his booming voice among other things.  All in all, I might as well had been sent to a deep south “gender school.” The interactions between my parents, much more so than anything they ever said to me, were responsible for socialization around gender.

As it pertains to the empowerement vs activism debate, the ideas I got about what a woman should be from my parents were strictly limited to the empowerment model.  A woman should be confident, articulate, intelligent, and so on.  If, for some reason, she could not succeed at something in life, it was because she was not doing something right.  Activism, on the other hand, was beyond the scope of proper for a woman.  After all, if there were no institutional inequalities, then there was no cause to be an activist about.  I’m still curious to this day if either of my parents is even aware of the advantages/disadvantages their respective genders have faced them with in life.  And considering that fact, I can’t really blame them for giving me a dynamic view of gender roles in society that they didn’t even have themselves.

By the grace of God, (oh the irony) and perhaps because of my natural hostility to authority, I never really took well to a lot of the things my parents told me, including the way my father and my mother proceeded to socialize me around gender.  In some ways, where I am today is because much of it has backfired. This story probably sums it up well; on one occasion I recall my father discussing with me how Adam and Eve were once only Adam, neither male nor female having the control over the other.  “In a perfect world man was not over woman,” he earnestly explained, “they were equals.”  But of course we all know what happened when Eve ate the forbidden fruit, and quite predictably, my dad never seemed too upset about that.

3 thoughts on “The Blind Leading the Blind

  1. I picked up on the thread of your post where you seemed to present empowerment v activism as a either or choice. I challenge you to think about empowerment and activism as related and not opposed to one another. Empowerment can be defined in at least a dozen ways, and includes being self sufficient, confident, standing up for one’s rights, believing one can make a difference, etc. Individual empowerment could be a pre-requisite for activisim. That is, in order to bring about broad social change and justice, individuals who believe they have the capacity to do so (i.e., are empowered) join together for a greater good.

  2. I appreciate your candor when discussing what for so many of us is such a fraught subject: instruction into our family’s gender ideologies. Your post suggests to me that internal, and unsustainable, contradictions between what you understood yourself to be and what your father expected you to become helped challenge simplistic understandings of gender categories and identities. I am left wondering if there were other sources, familial or more broadly social, that provided support to you in your own process of gender identification. Also, after reading about your father’s attempts at gender “disciplining,” I am left wanting more insights into your mother’s role. Did she only lead by example, or did she in other ways make explicit her own sense of gender roles and identities?

  3. @Michele: I definitely agree that they are most usefully thought of as a tandem rathern than opposing sides.

    @Yvonne: I think in the case of my mother, the influence of her understanding of gender on me was more implicit because I was boy. She never said, “Alex, a man does…” to me. However, I’m sure she said more direct things like “Ladies don’t do that.” or “That’s for boys.” to my younger sister. Hope that answers your question.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *