Author: Megan Nasgovitz

Oceans and Climate: The role of the Earth’s biggest Ecosystem at COP 22

At a side event on oceans at COP 22 Dr. Kyle Van Houtan, Duke alum and current director of science at the Monterey Bay Aquarium, claimed, “the oceans are the lungs of the planet and the heart of the climate change”. While this seems like a bold statement especially somewhere like the COP, if we consider the huge role that oceans play in all of our lives we see that the importance of oceans cannot be overstated. Oceans:

  • cover 71% of the earth
  • contain 96% of the living space on earth
  • are home to 80% of earths living organisms
  • provide the biggest source of wild or domestic protein in the world
  • create almost half the oxygen we breathe
  • carry 90% of world trade
  • hold an estimated 80% of the worlds mineral resources

Despite the importance of oceans, until last year they had not received much attention within COP. Although they are often discussed indirectly in topics such as adaptation, mitigation, disaster displacement, fisheries and the blue economy, the Paris Agreement is the first of the UNFCCC agreements in which oceans have been acknowledged. Last year at COP 21, Oceans Inc. reported on the over 70 events dedicated to oceans documenting their increased prominence, and throughout COP 21 several countries lent support to the ‘Because the Ocean’ Declaration which aims to create a special report on oceans through the IPCC, continue this work at the UN Ocean SDG Conference in Fiji in June 2017, and elaborate on an ocean action plan under the UNFCCC.

 

Major Ways Ocean Affects Climate

Although so many ocean processes and events are crucial to climate health, the most critical phenomenon at this time are ocean warming, ocean acidification and deoxygenation.

Ocean Warming

The oceans have shielded the world from rapid climate change by absorbing 1/3 of the carbon we produce and 93% of excess heat from global warming. The top 10 feet of the ocean hold as much heat as our entire atmosphere, but picking up this slack has not been without consequence and it is unclear how long the oceans can maintain this rate of absorption. As oceans warm, ice melts faster intensifying sea level rise and ocean circulation patterns slow down as there is less cold water being submerged which also affects upwelling. These are just a few of the possible negative implications of warming oceans, but the increased heat in the ocean has profound affects for a plethora of biological, chemical and physical ocean processes.

This image shows upper ocean warming over the past decade with red indicating a warming anomaly and blue indicating a cooling anomaly. (Source: Timo Bremer/LLNL)

This image shows upper ocean warming over the past decade with red indicating a warming anomaly and blue indicating a cooling anomaly. (Source: Timo Bremer/LLNL)

Ocean Acidification

A related but separate issue facing the oceans is acidification. As the oceans take up an increasing amount of carbon, the chemical make-up of the water changes and the ocean moves from an alkaline environment to an acidic one. This can be fatally detrimental to much of the marine life that lives there particularly corals and organisms that have an exoskeleton or shell. Although these creatures are most directly affected, this will have implications for entire food webs, including for humans who rely on oceans as an important protein source.  The potential harmful ramifications of acidification have been acknowledged by many around the world, including the Plymouth Marine Lab who made this short animation bringing to light the effects of acidification, and can already be seen at home in the US in the Arctic.

Deoxygenation

Another major effect climate change can have on oceans is the level of oxygen in the water. Warmer temperatures reduce oxygen solubility, but surface run off and ocean acidification can also play a role in deoxygenizing the ocean. Declining oxygen concentrations in the water will put stress on organisms that require oxygen to live as, according to National Geographic, low-oxygen areas have expanded by more than 1.7 million square miles in the last 50 years. If deoxygenation continues it will limit where species can live or if they will survive, which could negatively affect fisheries and the populations that rely on them.

Ocean art on display in the Green Zone at COP 22

Ocean art on display in the Green Zone at COP 22

Oceans at COP 22

While oceans perhaps weren’t as prominent at COP 22 as they were at COP21, there were several side events dedicated to awareness of oceans, and Prince Albert of Monaco and Princess Lalla of Morocco hosted, along with several other influential figures, Ocean Actions Day. During COP 22, the Ocean Action partners released the Strategic Action Roadmap on Oceans and Climate: 2016 to 2021, which provides comprehensive policy recommendations concerning oceans for the next five years. The roadmap specifically addresses the role of oceans in regulating climate, mitigation, adaptation, displacement, financing, and capacity development.

While these are great steps forward in the process of inclusion of oceans in the UNFCCC, as of now, there is still some discrepancy in who is giving attention to oceans. More than 2/3 of NDC’s include the ocean in some sense, but 14 countries that have coasts don’t include them. Many Annex 1 countries specifically, including the US, don’t address oceans even though they are coastal nations. Despite this, the momentum for addressing oceans in the climate negotiations continues to grow among states, NGO’s, academia and even within religious sectors. As Dr. Nigel Crawhill, representative of the Indigenous Peoples of Africa and the International Network of Buddhists, said in a panel on human abuse of the oceans, “sometimes we can become paralyzed by the complexity of the ocean problem, but in Buddhism the moment of enlightenment is only in the present, only now can we understand the capacity for ourselves to act.” Let us hope as we move forward as individuals, countries, and with each successive COP we continue to act on this important oceans agenda.

 

Sources:

Laffoley, D and Baxter J.M. Explaining Ocean Warming: Causes, Scale, Effects and Consequences. IUCN. September 2016.

AMAP Arctic Ocean Acidification Assessment: Summary for Policy-makers. This document presents the Executive Summary of the 2013 Arctic Ocean Acidification (AOA) Assessment. 2013.

Hot, Sour and Breathless- Ocean Under Stress. Report to UNFCCC in Durban, South Africa. 2010. http://usa.oceana.org/sites/default/files/ocean_under_stress_low_res.pdf

Welch, Craig. Oceans Are Losing Oxygen and Becoming More Hostile to Life. National Geographic. March 13, 2015.

Arctic at COP 22

A few weeks ago, I had the privilege of attending the Arctic Circle conference in Reykjavik, Iceland, an annual forum for governments, NGO’s, industry and scientists to converge on the most pressing Arctic issues facing the world.  Although it feels far away for many of us, the melting of the Arctic may be one of the most defining events of our lives due to its far reaching consequences on rising sea level, rising ocean temperature, carbon release from melting permafrost, potential effects on global ocean circulation disrupting upwelling and fisheries and much more. As keynote speaker Ban Ki Moon warned, “when the Arctic suffers, the world feels the pain.”

UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon stops by Arctic Circle Conference to address climate change in this delicate region

UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon stops by Arctic Circle Conference to address climate change in this delicate region

Few Arctic specific laws or policies currently exist as there was not much need to internationally govern what used to be a distant frozen mass, but as the ice melts and the Arctic opens up allowing an ever increasing number of actors access to it, there is a new need for these to be developed.

This process is occurring right now and repeatedly at Arctic Circle heads of state, NGOs and academics have referenced the Paris Agreement emphasizing how reducing global emissions to a 1.5 degree Celsius increase could help save the Arctic.  The Arctic is warming at a much faster rate than most of the world, so a 2 degree global increase in warming could mean at least 5-6 degrees of warming in the Arctic, which would be devastating for the marine life and the ice.[1] Over the past 30 years alone, the Arctic has already warmed about 1.5 degrees C which is much more rapidly than the normal rate of melting, as highlighted in the NASA graphic below. This increased warming can be seen in every season of the year, not just summer, and NASA warns that this could have serious and far reaching affects not only for ice, ocean processes and sea level rise, but for land ice melt, coastal and island nations, as well as the chemical make-up of our atmosphere.[2]

Rates of Arctic temperature change over time (Source: NASA)

Rates of Arctic temperature change over time (Source: NASA)

In light of these serious and well known potential consequences of warming in the Arctic and considering the attention given to the Paris Agreement at Arctic Circle, COP 22 (the self-proclaimed ‘COP of Action’) was a bit of a disappointment Arctic wise.

At Arctic Circle, Ban Ki-Moon called the Arctic ‘the ground zero for climate change’, yet at COP 22 there was very little mention of the Arctic whatsoever. This was especially disappointing after Arctic 21, a coalition of organizations focused on drawing attention to climate change in the Arctic, emerged last year in preparation for Paris.

Although this is disappointing, it was not altogether surprising. At the COP we see groups of likeminded countries coming together to form alliances over shared environmental conditions and values such as AOSIS or the Alliance of rainforest nations. The eight Arctic countries differ from these groups in that they are all fairly large wealthy developed countries, and for the most part, the Arctic is not their main priority at these meetings. This is particularly true for a country like the US, who have a plethora of other environmental goals and where the Arctic is a very small and physically removed portion of the country.

Eight Arctic Countries and land they have within the Arctic Circle

Eight Arctic Countries and land they have within the Arctic Circle (Source: Google)

With the emergence of an alliance of Arctic states being very unlikely at COP 22, where and when will the Arctic get its international representation? As of now, the Arctic Council is one of the only forum that gathers and addresses Arctic issues, but membership is limited to the eight Arctic countries and a few selected observers. For countries vying for Arctic Council observer status, a truly international climate meeting such as COP could have been an excellent doorway into addressing Arctic environmental issues at a broader scale.

In coming years as the ice melt continues to accelerate, it will be interesting to see if some of the smaller Arctic states not so heavily reliant on offshore oil, such as Iceland or Greenland, attempt to bring the Arctic into the spotlight at COP or try to merge Arctic interests with a group like AOSIS, or whether the issue will remain on the bench in the UNFCCC.

 

[1] A 5 Degree C Arctic in a 2 Degree C World: Challenges and Recommendations for Immediate Action. Briefing Paper for Arctic Science Ministerial.  Sept 28, 2016.

[2] Ramanujan, Krishna. Dwindling Arctic Ice. NASA Earth Observatory. October 24, 2003. http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/ArcticIce/arctic_ice.php

© 2025 Duke to the UNFCCC

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑