The main point of this check is to confirm you are doing your due diligence in following the directions about what goes in your QQC Doc. In the real world, no one actually checks your notes to hold you to some standard. The only person that might ever care is the future you that has to go back and use those notes. However, the intention behind this exercise is to provide structure and help you practice reasonable organization and note-taking skills with me (Prof. Stephens-Martinez) to hold you accountable.
There are 10 possible points for each check, and they will be awarded as follows:
- Exemplary (10 points) – Formatting is correct for all entries (title, citation, link if needed), and there are at least three “things” per entry. A thing can be a question, comment, or quote, but you do not need one of each.
- Satisfactory (9 points) – Some formatting is incorrect, but otherwise, everything is there.
- Not yet (6 points) – It is clearly missing one or more entries or frequently has fewer than three “things” per entry.
- Unassessable (2 points) – The document exists and there is an attempt at at least one entry, but otherwise, there is little there.
Regrade
You may redo/update the work and request a single regrade to update your grade. To ask for a regrade email the instructor with the subject: “CS290 Regrade: QQC Doc Check-in” include a link to your QQC doc.
Checklist for QQC Check-in 1, due Thursday, 9/29
- Handbook: Ch 1 History of CER
- Handbook: Ch 3 Literature Review and Voices from the Field Part 1
- Some academic papers in CER: Student help-seeking and formative assessments
- 3 entries, one from each paper in that assignment
- BYOPaper: ICER or Handbook
Checklist for QQC Check-in 2, due Thursday, 11/3
- Handbook: Ch 3 Literature Review and Voices from the Field Part 2
- How to write briskly and well
- Chapter in Critically Conscious Computing
- BYOPaper: SIGCSE or Handbook
- Handbook: Ch 16 Equity and Diversity
