How Foreign Direct Investment Impacts Domestic Productivity: The Case of Vietnam
by Minh Phuong Nguyen Hoang
Abstract
Foreign direct investment (FDI) has long been known as a vital driver of economic growth in many developing countries by providing capital boosts, generating employment, and introducing advanced technology. This paper focuses on a more long-term economic impact of FDI — the productivity spillover effect — in the specific case of Vietnam. Using firm-level data from the Vietnam’s Enterprise Survey from 2013 to 2022, I conduct a regional analysis to investigate 1) how foreign presence affects the productivity of firms in the region, and 2) how engagement in international activity further boosts firms’ productivity. Findings indicate that both domestic and foreign firms experience a statistically significant productivity boost as the level of foreign presence in the province increases, with domestic firms seeing a more substantial positive impact. Overall, my study aims to present a comprehensive picture of the dynamic between FDI and domestic productivity, thereby offering insights into how foreign investment can shape Vietnam’s economic landscape. This research can help inform Vietnam’s strategic FDI policies to foster technological advancement and strengthen its global economic integration, which has become a critical priority as the country navigates an unprecedented influx of high-tech foreign investment spurred by the ongoing US-China trade war.
Professor Michelle Connolly, Faculty Advisor
Professor Edmund Malesky, Faculty Advisor
JEL Codes: F21; F43; O30; O33
Keywords: FDI, Productivity, Knowledge Spillover, Vietnam, Economic Development
Email for Access to Data
Monetary Unions and Long-Run Growth
By Levi Crews
This paper develops two complementary models of monetary unions and long-run growth. The key result is that a reduction in foreign exchange costs via monetary unication provides a positive growth effect for member nations. This growth effect may come through increased knowledge spillovers in the deterministic model or through the migration of funds to higher-yield investments in the stochastic model. Empirical evidence is presented that generally supports both of these channels of growth.
Advisor: Pietro Peretto | JEL Codes: F43; F45; O42.
