CALL TO ACTION: JOURNALISTS

 
 
  • Stop equating medical experts and anti-abortion activists. Stories about abortion often seek “objective balance” by quoting facts from medical experts and then biased information from anti-abortion activists. Quality of information from these two groups is very different and it is journalists’ responsibility to help the public understand that.
 
  • Provide public health and social context about abortion and the range of people affected. Stories about abortion in the news rarely include basic public health information about abortion. Therefore, the public and policymakers may misunderstand abortion’s frequency and safety. Journalists can improve understanding of abortion by including accurate, timely data about, for example, the prevalence and safety of abortion and the public’s support of abortion. (See other recommendations for advocates from the Berkeley Media Studies Group).
 
  • Use the language recommendations of the American College of Obstetricians & Gynecologists when reporting on abortion.
 
  • Expand abortion coverage so the public and policymakers understand the demographics of people who get abortions. Current coverage tends to focus on the experiences of white communities and young women, but people of color are more likely to have abortions than white people, and the majority of people who get abortions are adult mothers, not teenagers (See other recommendations for advocates from the Berkeley Media Studies Group).
 
 
  • Give context that help the public understand the principles of Reproductive Justice. Here’s a good primer from the Charlotte Reproductive Action Network: RJ Briefing Booklet.