by Neha Karna
Abstract
High levels of global M&A activity have characterized the past decade, making the policy debate over the impact of mergers on innovation even more pertinent. Innovation is a significant driver of economic growth and therefore a negative effect of mergers on innovation outcomes may have detrimental consequences. Nevertheless, the existing literature demonstrates mixed results leaving it unclear whether the overall effect is positive or negative. This paper contributes to existing literature on the relationship between mergers and innovation and examines the effects of M&A on the subsequent innovative activity of acquiring firms that operate in high technology (high-tech) industries. I construct a sample of U.S.-based public-to-public deals from 2010-2019 involving high-tech acquiring firms. Using multivariable regression with robust considerations, I analyze factors that may explain post-merger R&D intensity defined as the merged entity’s R&D expenditure divided by its total assets one year after deal completion. I consider firm characteristics of the target and acquirer, including size, industry, and age, and industry competition. I find potential positive impact of relative target size on post-merger R&D intensity and significant interaction effects between relative target size and firm age, relative target size and industry relatedness, and target industry competition and industry relatedness. My results suggests that beyond the occurrence of a merger, specific deal characteristics may affect postmerger innovation outcomes.
Professor Grace Kim, Faculty Advisor
Professor Kent Kimbrough, Faculty Advisor
JEL Codes: G3; G34; L40; O31; O32;
