by Jakobe Bussey

Abstract

This study utilizes state-of-the-art BERT (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers) models to perform sentiment analysis on Wall Street Journal and New York Times articles about the Iraq War published between 2002 and 2012 and further categorize them using advanced unsupervised machine learning techniques. By utilizing statistical analysis and quartic regression models, this paper concludes that the two newspapers report on the Iraq War differently, with both exhibiting a predominantly negative-neutral tone overall. Additionally, the analysis reveals significant fluctuations in negativity from both outlets over time as the war progresses. Furthermore, this study examines the objectivity of reporting between editorial and non-editorial articles, finding that non-editorials tend to report more objectively, and the neutrality of editorials remains relatively constant while the objectivity of non-editorials fluctuates in response to war events. Finally, the paper investigates variations in sentiment across different topics, uncovering substantial variations in positive, neutral, and negative sentiments across topics and their evolution over time.

Professor Peter Arcidiacono, Faculty Advisor

JEL Codes: L8, L82, H56

View Thesis