by Andrew Ryan Griffin
Abstract
Starting with Executive Order 13166 in 2000, the United States federal government
began to address the language disparity issues in health care. Around the same time, several
states have begun to pass language access (LA) legislation mandating translation and
interpretation services at hospitals for limited English proficient (LEP) individuals. This study
uses these multiple discontinuities to evaluate the effect of language access laws on infant
mortality rates, adequacy of care, Apgar scores, and the number of prenatal visits from the years
1995 to 2004 for limited English proficient families. I find ambiguous results of language access
laws positively impacting infant mortality rates or Apgar scores, but I find clear positive impacts
on the adequacy of care and the number of prenatal visits. These findings suggest that language
access laws have a clear effect on reducing barriers for limited English proficient mothers, and
improving the care mothers receive. Furthermore, there is limited evidence that it improves
infant health or outcomes, but the increase of prenatal visits and adequacy of care likely
indirectly leads to improving infant mortality rates and Apgar scores. More research is needed
into discovering how those mechanisms work and the costs of language services.
Michelle Conolly, Faculty Advisor
JEL codes: I10, I18, I19
