by Steven R. Vickers
Abstract
Because currency and banking crises cause substantial and prolonged disruptions
to an economy, economists have long sought ways to predict these events in advance.
One recent theory advanced is the “leading indicators” approach of Kaminsky (1998) and
Kaminsky and Reinhart (1999). Kaminsky (1998) presents four separate composite
indicators, and Kaminsky and Reinhart (1999) refines the model. This paper provides one
test of this theory by analyzing the currency and banking crises that arose in July 2002 in
Uruguay. This study tests the efficacy of these indicators by analyzing the behavior of
the indicators in the months directly preceding the Uruguayan crises. In general, three
indicators performed reasonably well, while one had exceptional predictive power.
Professor Stephanie Schmitt-Grohé, Faculty Advisor
JEL Codes: E47, G01, G15,
