Home » Uncategorized
Category Archives: Uncategorized
What is the Natural History of Low Back Pain? It Depends
March 14, 2025 / Leave a comment
By: Chad E Cook PT, PhD, FAPTA
Definition: The natural history of a disease refers to the progression of a disease in an individual over time, from its onset (pathological or exposure to causal agents) to its resolution. It is generally considered “natural” when no interventions are used that could affect the resolution process [1,2]. Natural history should encompass both the subclinical phase (when the disease is asymptomatic) and the clinical phase (when symptoms are apparent), thus how the “episode” of the disease is defined is of considerable importance. Other terms used to represent natural history include disease progression, course over time, epidemiological trajectory, or disease lifecycle.
Favorable Outcomes: Historically, most musculoskeletal conditions, specifically, low back pain (LBP) are thought to have a favorable natural history. For example, in an older, very well cited paper, it was stated that LBP episodes are self-limiting, suggesting that 90% of patients recover in 6 weeks without loss of function [3]. As such, natural history is commonly factored in to the management process for individuals with LBP in clinical practice guidelines and dedicated treatment strategies. Most clinical practice guidelines have nominal suggestions for acute LBP (pain less than six weeks) when compared to chronic LBP, as it is thought to resolve on its own [4,5]. Stepped care strategies for managing LBP often align with the concept of natural history, and emphasize non-invasive, self-management approaches as the first step, allowing the natural recovery process to take its course [6].
Unfortunately, our understanding the natural history of conditions such as LBP is less clear than what we might think. This is because the process of measuring natural history has varied markedly across studies and is highly dependent on a number of factors [7].
Recent Blogs »
-
Advantages and Disadvantages of Research Metrics used to Evaluate a Researcher’s Impact or Influence
By: Chad E Cook PT, PhD, FAPTA Background: Each year, in Duke University’s Division of Physical Therapy, I teach a class on research methodology. One…
-
“It’s Not You, It’s Us…”: Heterogeneity of Treatment Effects as a Challenge to Effectiveness Trials.
By: Damian L Keter, PT, DPT, PhD Background: Comparative effectiveness studies are the cornerstone of medicine and health sciences research. They have a goal of…
-
Is Myofascial Pain Syndrome a Legitimate Primary Diagnosis?
By: Chad E Cook, Damian Keter, Ken Learman Background: Myofascial Pain Syndrome (MPS) is hypothesized to be both a primary and/or a secondary chronic pain…
-
Risk of Bias Measures can be Biased
By: Chad E Cook, Damian Keter, Ken Learman Navigating the Literature: Navigating the ever-growing, healthcare literature can be challenging [1]. The sheer amount of new…
-
Why Isn’t Everyone Using Stepped Care for Musculoskeletal Injuries?
By: Chad E. Cook PT, PhD, FAPTA Resource efficiency models Musculoskeletal (MSK) outcomes have shown some concerning trends over the last decade. Conditions like low…
-
Three Ways That Recruitment in Randomized Controlled Trials May Not Reflect Real Life
By: Chad Cook, Amy McDevitt, Derek Clewley, Bryan O’Halloran As we wind up a year of recruitment on the SS-MECH trial [1], we are compelled…