Home » Collected Essays » Typologies of Fraud » A Typology of Business Fraud in Modern Economies

A Typology of Business Fraud in Modern Economies

Business fraud comes in many shapes and sizes.  This variety speaks to the remarkable ingenuity of many business-owners and managers, as they have adapted long-standing modes of deception to new economic, social, and cultural circumstances.  As I stress in chapter two of Fraud, however, deceptive practices by firms also exhibit some remarkable continuities, which map onto enduring cognitive and emotional vulnerabilities.  Here I offer three short-hand encapsulations of these consistent patterns in the form and structure of American business fraud, which most likely obtain in other societies as well.

 

The Most Common Forms of Modern Business Fraud

An overview of the most common forms of business fraud, distinguished by targeted victims, major strategies of deception, and prevalent tactics to carry off those strategies
TargetsMajor StrategiesTactics
ConsumersBait and SwitchFake sales prices
Misleading contractual terms
False oral promises
Passing off (trademark infringement)
High pressure upselling
False claims – quality, origin
Phony endorsements
InvestorsMarket Manipulation
Creation of “Special Intelligence”
Pump & dump/bear & buy
“Affinity” selling (pyramid schemes)
High pressure selling
Decoy directors
Falsified accounting
Reloading (post-bankruptcy pleas for capital injections)
Insider trading
Business Counterparties (Creditors, Debtors, Suppliers)Bait and SwitchAdvance fee scams (client lists; credit access)
False representations to gain credit
Credit “bust-out”
Misleading contractual terms
Misleading financial data (franchise solicitations)
GovernmentContracting overchargesFalse representations to gain contracts
"Upcoding"
(healthcare reimbursement)
Provision of shoddy goods or services
EmployersInternal corporate "looting"Embezzlement
Self-dealing
Excessive compensation
False reporting/accounting

Organizational Fraud, Occupational Fraud, and Control Fraud

Below is a Venn diagram that conveys the relationship among “organizational fraud,” committed by a firm against one or more of its counterparties (consumers, investors, other businesses, and some agency of the state), and “occupational fraud,” committed by corporate employees against their employer.

Venn diagram of organizational, occupational, and control fraud
The overlapping space in the diagram denotes the phenomenon of “control fraud,” in which high-level corporate executives take advantage of their managerial positions to defraud their employer to such an extent that their actions also bring significant losses to the firm’s investors and counterparties.

 

Cognitive Heuristics and Economic Strategies of Deception

An overview of the most important fraud-related cognitive and emotional vulnerabilities identified by behavioral psychologists, linked to the specific forms of deceptive marketing that take advantage of them. Scholars of risk regulation tend to distinguish between the magnitude and probability of risk vectors, and the susceptibility of targets to those risks. This catalogue of psychological vulnerabilities identifies common weak spots of fraud targets, and by implication, potential opportunities to heighten the resilience of economic actors when they confront economic deception, resilience typically built up through strategies of education and information disclosure.
Psychological ShortcutRelated Deceptive Tactics
Faith in Social Proof

(reliance on the judgments of other individuals in
one’s social group)
Pyramid schemes (affinity marketing)
Pump & dump schemes
Multi-level marketing schemes (affinity marketing)
Representativeness Heuristic

(presumption that social markers and cultural cues provide evidence of trustworthiness and reputation)
Variations on Social and Cultural Mimicry (emulating key features of successful/trustworthy firms)

“Decoy” corporate directors
Trademark infringement
Reputable business address
High-toned offices and slick salespersons
Shows of anti-fraud investigations/critiques
Availability Heuristic

(tendency to make probabilistic inferences on the basis of memorable recent events/experiences)
Especially significant with investment frauds

Bait payment of dividends (pyramid schemes; fake mutual funds)
Invocation of massive returns by early investors in blockbuster companies
Floating fraudulent firms within sectors undergoing asset booms
Anchoring Heuristic

(reliance on baseline economic valuations as reference point for later decision-making)
In consumer frauds:
Offers of “free” merchandise
Fictitious pricing (fake discounts from excessively marked up “standard” pricing)
Bait advertising of special deals

In investment frauds:
Low pricing of investment units
Offer of installment purchasing
Loss Aversion

(Tendency to value perceived losses as greater than potential gains of an equivalent magnitude)
In consumer frauds:
Expectation of ability to hold on to consumers attracted by bait advertising

In investment frauds:
“Last chance” pitches for getting in to a fantastic opportunity early
“Reloading” schemes (pleas for additional injections of capital to reorganize bankrupt companies)

In occupational frauds:
Inclination of embezzling employees or traders who have racked up big losses and then hid them to take big risks on behalf of their companies in hopes of recouping losses/covering up initial improprieties

In control frauds:
Inclination of managers of failing firms to falsify accounts and take big risks in hopes of staving off bankruptcy

©2017 Edward J. Balleisen