I assembled a table summarizing the results for the non-overlapping tests as I am confused about several of them –
| Path | 1 Hop | Path | 2 Hop |
| SDN01->SDN07 | 8999.5 | SDN01->SDN11 | 7771.6 |
| SDN02->SDN05 | 7967.7 | SDN02->SDN09 | 7685.8 |
| SDN03->SDN06 | 7910.8 | SDN03->SDN10 | 8406.4 |
| SDN05->SDN01 | 9056.3 | ||
| SDN05->SDN09 | 9041.7 | ||
| SDN06->SDN02 | 9005.1 | ||
| SDN06->SDN10 | 8978.1 | ||
| SDN07->SDN03 | 8733.7 | ||
| SDN07->SDN11 | 8705.8 | ||
| SDN09->SDN07 | 7870.8 | SDN09->SDN03 | 9073.2 |
| SDN10->SDN05 | 7584.9 | SDN10->SDN01 | 8119.0 |
| SDN11->SDN06 | 8740.1 | SDN11->SDN02 | 8006.4 |
So – the results that may deserve a deeper look are –
SDN03->SDN06/SDN03->SDN10 and SDN09->SDN07/SDN09->SDN03
which both show the 2 hop results having higher performance than the single hop results.
The variability of the other results in 1 hop consistency vs. 2 hop consistency may also need to be looked at. Look at the next post – the spread of the results as shown by the standard deviation does not appear to be big enough to cover the discrepancy – typically there were about 150 samples for each measurement
| Path | 1 Hop | Path | 2 Hop |
| SDN01->SDN07 | 8999.5 | SDN01->SDN11 | 7771.6 |
| SDN02->SDN05 | 7967.7 | SDN02->SDN09 | 7685.8 |
| SDN03->SDN06 | 7910.8 | SDN03->SDN10 | 8406.4 |
| SDN05->SDN01 | 9056.3 | ||
| SDN05->SDN09 | 9041.7 | ||
| SDN06->SDN02 | 9005.1 | ||
| SDN06->SDN10 | 8978.1 | ||
| SDN07->SDN03 | 8733.7 | ||
| SDN07->SDN11 | 8705.8 | ||
| SDN09->SDN07 | 7870.8 | SDN09->SDN03 | 9073.2 |
| SDN10->SDN05 | 7584.9 | SDN10->SDN01 | 8119.0 |
| SDN11->SDN06 | 8740.1 | SDN11->SDN02 | 8006.4 |
