- Learning Objectives available for this checkpoint: LO1 – LO13 (All of them!)
-
- Reminder: You do not need to attempt any LO for which you have an E or are satisfied with your S grade on it.
- Tell us which LOs you plan to do.
- When: Thursday 11/20, during regular class time
- You may bring one piece of standard-sized paper as a helper sheet and can put things on the front and back.
-
Rubrics
Here are the rubrics that we will use to grade your answers to Learning Objectives 12 and 13. To see prior rubrics:
-
-
- LO1 – Lo2 rubric: checkpoint 9/11
- LO3 – LO5 rubric: checkpoint 9/25
- LO6 – LO7 rubric: checkpoint 10/9
- LO8 – LO9 rubric: checkpoint 10/23
- LO10 – LO11 rubric: checkpoint 11/06
-
LO12
- Exemplary
- Correctly identifies a problematic behavior that does not support learning.
- If motivated reasoning is present, correctly identifies it. If it is not, correctly identifies an additional problematic behavior that does not support learning.
- Explanation for the identification is clear, thorough, and draws on concepts learned in class. The recommendations are reasonable and integrated with the explanation.
- Correctly uses relevant terminology.
- Satisfactory
- Correctly identifies a problematic behavior that does not support learning.
- May miss the motivated reasoning if it is present.
- Explanation for the identification is reasonable, but lacks some clarity or thoroughness. The recommendations are reasonable, but are not fully integrated with the explanation.
- Uses relevant terminology with some occasional omissions or imprecisions.
- Not Yet – Anything that does not mean Satisfactory, such as:
- Incorrectly identifies problematic behaviors that do not support learning OR does not identify any of them.
- Claims that there is motivated reasoning when there is not.
- Explanation is vague, incomplete, or incorrect, such that it is not clear how well the author understands the concepts from class.
- Key terminology is misused.
LO13
- Exemplary
- Correctly identifies one issue in the prompt and provides two ways to improve the prompt.
- Explanation for the issue and the rationale for the improvements are clear, thorough, and draw on concepts learned in class. The improvements fix the issue, would improve the output, are reasonable, and are integrated with the explanation.
- Correctly uses relevant terminology.
- Satisfactory
- Correctly identifies one issue in the prompt and provides one way to improve the prompt.
- Explanation for the issue and the rationale for the improvements are reasonable, but lack some clarity or thoroughness. The improvement fixes the issue, is reasonable, but is not fully integrated with the explanation.
- Uses relevant terminology with some occasional omissions or imprecisions.
- Not Yet – Anything that does not mean Satisfactory, such as:
- Does not identify an issue in the prompt.
- The improvements do not fix the issue.
- Explanation is vague, incomplete, or incorrect, such that it is not clear how well the author understands the concepts from class.
- Key terminology is misused.