• Learning Objectives available for this checkpoint: LO1 and LO2
• When: Thursday 9/11, during regular class time
• You may bring one piece of standard-sized paper as a helper sheet and can put things on the front and back.

Rubrics

Here are the rubrics that we will use to grade your answer to each learning objective.

LO1

1. Exemplary
   1. Accurately identifies a LO in each zone of the ZPD framework.
   2. Explanation for the identification is clear and thorough, including a discussion of the learning objectives and how it is supported.
   3. Correctly uses relevant terminology.
2. Satisfactory
   1. Accurately identifies a LO in two of the zones of the ZPD framework.
   2. Explanation for the identification is reasonable, but lacks some clarity, thoroughness, or discussion about how the learning is supported.
   3. Uses relevant terminology with some occasional omissions or imprecisions.
3. Not Yet – Anything incomplete or that does not mean Satisfactory, such as:
   1. Only identifies a LO in one of the zones of the ZPD framework OR incorrectly identifies an instance that is inside/outside of ZPD.
   2. Explanation is vague, incomplete, or incorrect, such that it is not clear how well the author understands ZPD.
   3. Key terminology is misused.

LO2

1. Exemplary
   1. Accurately identifies the specific knowledge dimension and cognitive process dimensions.
   2. Explanation for the identification is clear and thorough, including a discussion on why it is not at other potential levels.
   3. Correctly uses relevant terminology.
2. Satisfactory
   1. Accurately identifies either the specific knowledge dimension or cognitive process dimensions. The other is only slightly inaccurate.
   2. Explanation for the identification is reasonable, but lacks some clarity or thoroughness.
   3. Uses relevant terminology with some occasional omissions or imprecisions.
3. Not Yet – Anything incomplete or that does not mean Satisfactory, such as:
   1. Either slightly incorrectly identifies the specific knowledge dimension and cognitive process dimensions OR at least one identification is very inaccurate.
   2. Explanation is vague, incomplete, or incorrect, such that it is not clear how well the author understands the knowledge dimensions or cognitive process dimensions.
   3. Key terminology is misused.