• Learning Objectives available for this checkpoint: LO10 – LO11
  • Reminder: You do not need to attempt any LO for which you have an E or are satisfied with your S grade on it.
  • Tell us which LOs you plan to do.
• When: Thursday 11/6, during regular class time
• You may bring one piece of standard-sized paper as a helper sheet and can put things on the front and back.

Rubrics

Here are the rubrics that we will use to grade your answers to Learning Objectives 10 and 11. To see prior rubrics:

• LO1 – Lo2 rubric: checkpoint 9/11
• LO3 – LO5 rubric: checkpoint 9/25
• LO6 – LO7 rubric: checkpoint 10/9
• LO8 – LO9 rubric: checkpoint 10/23 

LO10 (see 10/21 class slides for a concrete example)

1. Exemplary
   1. Work fully demonstrates mastery of the concepts and procedures necessary for calculating the (conditional) probability of an event.
   2. Correctly uses relevant terminology.
2. Satisfactory
   1. Arrives at the correct numerical answer, but without any accompanying work, or the accompanying work is vague and does not fully demonstrate mastery of the concepts.
   2. Uses relevant terminology with some occasional omissions or imprecisions.
3. Not Yet – Anything that does not mean Satisfactory, such as:
   1. Incorrect numerical answer without work that fully demonstrates mastery.
   2. Incomplete work that does not answer all parts in the question.
   3. Key terminology is severely misused.

LO11

1. Exemplary
   1. Correctly identifies the school of probability thought
   2. Correctly identifies any hidden/implicit assumptions
   3. Correctly identifies any fallacies/paradoxes
   4. Explanations for all three above are clear, thorough, and draw from the evidence provided in the scenario
   5. Proposes an appropriate fix for the fallacies/paradoxes part, if applicable
   6. Correctly uses relevant terminology
2. Satisfactory
   1. Correctly identifies the school of probability thought
   2. Correctly identifies any hidden/implicit assumptions
   3. Correctly identifies any fallacies/paradoxes
   4. Some explanations are unclear, not thorough, or do not draw from the evidence provided in the scenario.
   5. Uses relevant terminology with some occasional omissions or imprecisions.
3. Not Yet – Anything that does not mean Satisfactory, such as:
   1. Incorrect school of probability thought
   2. Hidden/implicit assumptions not identified or incorrectly identified
   3. Fallacies/paradoxes not identified or incorrectly identified
   4. Explanation is vague, incomplete, or incorrect, such that it is not clear how well the author understands the concepts from class.
   5. Key terminology is misused.