LO Checkpoint 9/25 (LO1 – LO5)

  • Learning Objectives available for this checkpoint: LO1 – LO5
  • When: Thursday 9/25, during regular class time
  • You may bring one piece of standard-sized paper as a helper sheet and can put things on the front and back.

Rubrics

Here are the rubrics that we will use to grade your answer to each learning objectives 3-5. To see LO1 – Lo2’s rubrics see checkpoint 9/11.

LO3

  1. Exemplary
    1. Correctly identifies which scenario needs a bigger strategy adjustment.
    2. Explanation for the identification is clear, thorough, and draws on concepts learned in class. The suggested strategy change(s) are reasonable and integrated with the explanation.
    3. Correctly uses relevant terminology.
  2. Satisfactory
    1. Correctly identifies which scenario needs a bigger strategy adjustment.
    2. Explanation for the identification is reasonable, but lacks some clarity or thoroughness. The strategy change(s) are reasonable, but are not fully integrated with the explanation.
    3. Uses relevant terminology with some occasional omissions or imprecisions.
  3. Not Yet – Anything incomplete or that does not mean Satisfactory, such as:
    1. Incorrectly identifies which scenario needs a bigger strategy adjustment.
    2. Explanation is vague, incomplete, or incorrect, such that it is not clear how well the author understands the concepts from class.
    3. Key terminology is misused.

LO4

  1. Exemplary
    1. Correctly identifies where the learner is in the 3P model.
    2. Explanation for the identification is clear, thorough, and draws on concepts learned in class. The recommendations are reasonable, are for the phase identified, and are integrated with the explanation.
    3. Correctly uses relevant terminology.
  2. Satisfactory
    1. Correctly identifies where the learner is in the 3P model.
    2. Explanation for the identification is reasonable, but lacks some clarity or thoroughness. The recommendations are reasonable and are for the phase identified, but are not fully integrated with the explanation.
    3. Uses relevant terminology with some occasional omissions or imprecisions.
  3. Not Yet – Anything incomplete or that does not mean Satisfactory, such as:
    1. Incorrectly identifies where the learner is in the 3P model.
    2. Explanation is vague, incomplete, or incorrect, such that it is not clear how well the author understands the concepts from class.
    3. Key terminology is misused.

LO5

  1. Exemplary
    1. Correctly identifies what is intrinsic and extraneous load and evaluates the level of germane load.
    2. Explanation for the identification is clear, thorough, and draws on concepts learned in class. The germane load evaluation is reasonable and integrated with the explanation.
    3. Correctly uses relevant terminology.
  2. Satisfactory
    1. Correctly identifies most of what is intrinsic and extraneous load, and the germane load evaluation is only slightly inaccurate.
    2. Explanation for the identification is reasonable, but lacks some clarity or thoroughness. The germane load evaluation is reasonable, but it is not fully integrated with the explanation.
    3. Uses relevant terminology with some occasional omissions or imprecisions.
  3. Not Yet – Anything incomplete or that does not mean Satisfactory, such as:
    1. Incorrectly identifies a key part of what is intrinsic or extraneous load OR the germane load evaluation is very inaccurate.
    2. Explanation is vague, incomplete, or incorrect, such that it is not clear how well the author understands the concepts from class.
    3. Key terminology is misused.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *