United States: Women vs. Men

 

Nike-US-Soccer-Home-Kit

(Photo: Nike Blog) (1)

  Comparing the U.S. Men and Women’s Teams’ Playing Styles

by Alex McIlvaine

Are Boys Better Than Girls At Sports?

I was a phenomenal heckler. As a child, I used to chirp at my sister, “boys are better than girls at sports!!”. My mother always silenced my arrogance and eventually clarified my perspective. She is more athletic than my father, and shares my interest in professional sports. Any scientific study reveals that women tend to be slower, weaker and smaller than men. Small lungs translates to less endurance and that is undebatable. However, gaining my love of sports from a woman led me to understand that physical difference does not render men “better” than women at sports. Sports have always been a complicated forum for gender issues. Differences in playing styles between the U.S. Men’s and Women’s National teams embody these complexities. While the men may play with more strength, speed and aggression, the more successful women exhibit more control, more strategy and a highly cerebral methodology. See the two showcased in a recent preview of the upcoming women’s World Cup in Canada, released by Fox Sports:

Women’s soccer generates as much national attention every four years as any other women’s athletic event. In contrast, men’s soccer, while popular, does not top the list of men’s most popular sports. Perhaps this is because U.S. women’s soccer is a highly successful organization; no team can boast more success since the inauguration of the women’s World Cup 28 years ago. Why the contrasting outcomes? Here are some differences between the two that may help explain…


 

1) The men are more aggressiveuss

The men’s game is not as gentle as the women’s. Mens players spend more time with the ball and draw more contact from opponents, showcased by their higher penalty rates. Their style is both belligerent and fearless. While women tend to settle for safer passes, men are often seen charging down the field with the ball. According to SoccerNation (2):

“Many American male soccer players are too focused on being great athletes with power, and are not as focused on the more technical aspects of soccer. ”

Speed and strength are key in men’s soccer. The hero of last summer’s World Cup was Tim Howard. The adoration emanating from social media outlets as he miraculously saved goal after goal by contouring his body in ways that seemed impossible, extending for balls that seemed unreachable. His athleticism qualified him the as image of the team. Youngster Julian Green provided the key spark in the U.S.’ rally against Ghana in the round of 16 with his blinding speed. Greatness is quantified by athleticism in mens soccer.

(Photo: Google Images) (5)


 

2) The women are more cerebral and technical 

In contrast, women display more finesse in their game. Their focus is on technique. Their style resembles European soccer more than the mens game does. Former U.S. player and current coach of the Women’s Professional Soccer League’s San Diego SeaLions Jen Lalor-Nielsen said:

“Men’s and Women’s soccer in America is very different. Women’s soccer is softer, more thoughtful. Men tend to react without thinking, whereas women tend to contemplate their moves more.” (2)

Nielsen suggests a reckless aspect exists with the men’s style. Her comments have merit. The women possess the ball for shorter amounts of time, typically passing after one or two touches. In contrast, the men are always moving to push the ball by themselves. Their second option seems to be passing. However, this is not to say the women cannot be characterized as physical and tough. Brandi Chastain will forever remain an icon of U.S. women’s soccer. She is famous for a photo of her celebrating the 1999 game winning goal of the World Cup, flexing her muscles, shirtless. Still, is the women’s selfless style a more pure form of the game? Retired U.S. defender and current Head Coach for the Miramar College Women’s Soccer team Sean Bowers believes so. He remarked:

“Women are by and large smarter than men…I like coaching the women better, because it’s not all about speed of play. It’s also about formation and the technical side of the game.” (2)

Where the women lack in athleticism, they make up for it with skill. However, is skill more exciting to watch than athleticism? TV ratings would indicate that it is not. Caitlin Fisher writes on the London School of Economics and Political Science website (3):

“Cross-culturally the women’s game is commonly positioned as a weaker, slower, less exciting version of the men’s game  One of my guy friends in college used to call women’s soccer “underwater soccer” because our long balls were shorter, our timing slower, our shots softer, our jumps lower, and our sprints less explosive. But slower, shorter, softer than what?—than the men’s game, of course. Well, so long as the women’s game continues to be positioned as a worse and less exciting version of the men’s game, then certainly people are going to always opt to watch the men.”

This attitude seems to be specific to the American viewing public. International styles of the game more closely resemble the U.S. women’s, rather than the mens, and soccer serves as the most popular sport of the continent.

 


 

3) The men are more individualistic, more like divas

Consistent with the characterization of U.S. Men’s Soccer present abovethe women play towards the interest of the team as a whole more than the men do. Their focus is less on personal success and more on team cohesion. Former goalkeeper at San Diego State University and President of the San Diego SeaLions Lu Snyder commented:

“Men are more individualistic in their approach to the game. Women are more loyal to the team as a whole.” (2)

The men’s aggression outlined above is interpreted by Snyder as selfishness. The women’s passing and patient strategy is reflective of a deeper commitment to the success of the team rather than the individual. Perhaps this is why so many dramatic stars exist in men’s soccer.


 

4) The women, slower, play with less breaks in the game

As noted earlier, the speed and aggression of the men outmatches that of the women. As a result, their games play at a different pace than the women. According to SoccerNation (2):

“Men’s soccer matches are often interrupted through fouls or aggressive play, and this statistically does not occur as much in women’s soccer.”

The smaller size and slower speed of the women allows them to work with more open space relative to the men. By the same token, their defense is less potent than the mens because of having more space to defend. Their pass-first mentality results in longer periods of possession and more control over the pace of the game. There is a smoother element to the women’s game. The men experience more turbulent possession patterns.


 

5) Women Are Not Fakers

“Flopping” is very popular in men’s soccer. Faking injuries have seemingly become a fundamental part of the game. Another reason that men experience more breaks in their games is their inclination towards faking injuries. A recent study led by sports medicine physician Daryl Rosenbaum compares this issue between men and women.

He examined a group of supposedly injured soccer players. The researchers wrote in the journal Research in Sports Medicine that only 14 percent of these athletes “met the criteria for a definite injury” and concluded “that women who do go down are twice as likely to be truly injured compared to men who hit the ground.” (4)

The piece continues: “To investigate, he and colleagues started by reviewing video footage of 89 men’s soccer games from four tournaments. The researchers counted a total of 980 supposed injuries. But, they reported last year in the International Journal of Sports Medicine, only about 7 percent of those qualified as definite injuries. A “definite injury” was defined by either visible bleeding or withdrawal from the game.” (4)

Clearly the trend of false injuries is more prevalent on the men’s side. This contrast contributes a sentiment of purity to the perception of the women’s team.

Is faking an injury just another form of team loyalty and determination? Or do the women play with more integrity?

Anson Dorrance, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill women’s soccer coach believes the latter. He said, “I thought that was a wonderful statement about the way women play the game.”

“Any time a male player is nicked, there’s rolling around, grabbing body parts, trying to sell the ref on some egregious fall to get a yellow card” or other penalties for the opposing team, he continued. “Women play the game with greater personal integrity and honor.” (4)

 


Conclusion

While the U.S. men’s team outmatches the women’s team in speed, strength and athleticism, women display a superior tactical and technical form. While neither the men nor the women replicate European soccer, the  women more closely resemble foreign styles. The men play with more aggression, and more physicality. In contrast, the women are quick to pass. They experience less stoppage in play and less faking of injuries. The more successful women’s team, who have won two World Cups and four olympic medals, exhibits a more pure playing style. However, with this more technical form of the game comes less excitement and ultimately, in the case of the United States, less popularity. The American pubic has demonstrated an interest in the more physical, more high paced men’s playing style.

The fervent national excitement generated by the men’s team last summer could be replicated and built on this summer in Canada by the women. Soccer has the U.S.’ attention more than it has in a long while.


 

Full Games

Put these observations to the test and watch two full games. Here is a recent match between the U.S. Women and the French Women…

Now watch the men take on Ghana last summer….


 

References 

1) Photo. http://www.nikeblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Nike-US-Soccer-Home-Kit.jpg

2) Discovery News. http://http://news.discovery.com/adventure/extreme-sports/womens-soccer-sports-110713.htm

3) London School of Economics and Political Science. http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/gender/2012/02/23/womens-soccer-in-crisis-a-voice-from-the-pitch/

4) Daryl Rosenbaum. Research in Sports Medicine.

5) Photo. http://wbhaa14.techiewebdev.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/united_states_mens_soccer_team_u_s_men_s_national_soccer_team_wallpaper_2_for_the_iphone_and_ipod_touch_coolpapers_Xz7uPQMr.sized_.jpg

 



 

7 thoughts on “United States: Women vs. Men

  1. Matthew

    From personal experience, I could contend with high school women’s soccer teams at 13 years old. Not only was I the size of most of them (5’8-5’9), I could outrun and outlast every player on their team without the slightest effort. Considering they had trained for about 3 years longer than I had, that’s considerable. Our coaches would often make us play each other as we were the youngest at that school and we wiped ass on a day-to-day basis, with scores as high as 11-4. With that said, stop the wishful thinking because unless evolution does a 180, women won’t be able to compare to men for quite a while.

    Reply
  2. Pingback: Who would’ve thought in the 21st century, women would be suffering form gender discrimination in sports? – Shivani Vij

  3. Tristan Gray

    While I appreciate the sentiment of the article – there are no quantifiables. The truth is that in fine motor skills men generally test far above the average woman and in soccer this is also true. Though you may believe that women play a more accurate and cerebral game – there is literally no quantifiable way to justify this opinion. If you look at completed passes or any other quantifiable way to measure how technical a game is – men are superior at soccer.

    I appreciate the emotional objective of your article but it is essentially the definition of bias which is somewhat ironic given your objective.

    Reply
  4. Some on who plays soccer

    I remember trying out for the boys team my freshman year. As a girl who hadn’t played it before, the coach was impressed that i could keep up with the guys, but he did point out some things that i still keep in mind. Even though i wasn’t quite as fast as the guys, i could keep going longer. I thought where to pass the ball immediately as it rolled to me. But after our school set up a girls team, i noticed some of the things that this article points out.
    Practices on the boys teams were mostly physical conditioning. Our coach (who was a guy), went over our plays and we all went through what we needed to do to win.
    I did have trouble adjusting to speed of play, but i could react faster because i was used to playing against guys.
    This comment might be useful, it might not. But i can see where these writers are coming from because i have noticed too. And hey, it could be different than my small town soccer teams out there…

    Reply
  5. jane

    “Women are by and large smarter than men…I like coaching the women better, because it’s not all about speed of play. It’s also about formation and the technical side of the game.”

    Why is it so often that people make such factually incorrect sweeping sexist statements against men? Imagine if the roles were reversed.

    The facts all point to men being smarter and more technical than the women. In all sports, all athletics, even in chess, snooker, pool, golf women are dominated by the men.

    Why are women so insecure about this?

    Reply
  6. Theda

    Women soccer is just as aggressive as men.. You just don’t realize it because girls tend to try and push forward when injured. When guys even get poked they fall to the floor and cry like little babies…

    Reply
  7. Benrey

    This article is absurd. The men’s team would absolutely blowout the women’s team. Despite making some decent points about the technical part of the game, the men’s athleticism is much better, and therefore they would win

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *