“Luxe, Calme et Volupté” 1904-1905 is a fauvist work by Henri Matisse. During the period in which it was painted, Matisse belonged to a group of young artists whose bold and unconventional works alarmed critics to the extent that they referred to them as“wild beasts” (les fauves). Matisse’s work, in particular, embodied this new spirit utilizing color and brush strokes to convey feelings and sensations in a fashion that broke dramatically with the canon.
- To See This Image Please Visit: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Matisse-Luxe.jpg
- Henri Matisse “Luxe, Calme et Volupté”, 1904
The work is a leisure scene that shows six nude women each from a different vantage point as they bathe and picnic on a beach in St. Tropez. Moving from left to right the viewer sees one woman from the back and another reclining with her nudity on full display. Behind her a smaller figure is seen wrapped in a blanket. At the foot of the reclining nude another woman is crouched combing through her hair. The penultimate figure is in a semi-reclined pose with her back to the viewer while the last is slightly turned such that her body is fully visible but her face is shown in profile. Matisse has placed these women in an idyllic even pastoral setting showing them on the shores of a lake. The only clues that this is a modern scene are the boat in the background and the picnic utensils placed in the left corner of the work.
In many ways this work is highly traditional. The subject matter of nude female bodies as created by a male artist and in particular bathers in a pastoral landscape “can be traced back to the work of Poussin” an artist that epitomized the values of Academic painters. Further, the title of the work comes from the chorus of a poem entitled L’invitation au voyage “which describes an escape to an Arcadian land of sensuality and calm.” Such references to poetry are in keeping with nineteenth-century Academic traditions.
The poem referenced, however is by symbolist poet Charles Baudelaire and indicative of Matisse’s modernist tendencies. Similarly, Matisse’s technique can only be described as modern. Matisse’s use of lozenge-like shapes reveals the artist’s every brushstroke. The bodies are portrayed crudely, some are little more than the outline of a shape. In addition, the use of the word “luxe” in this context conveys more than just “luxury” rather it suggests “voluptuousness, self-indulgence and sensuality” a well as a connection to the contemporary cult of “joie de vivre.”
Gill Perry suggests that it is precisely the tensions in the work between technique and subject matter that serves to disrupt the notion that these women are merely objects of the “male gaze.” Rather the Matisse has portrayed the women in an unreal manner manipulating and distorting their figures such that their physical oddness “undermines any easy perception of these women merely as objects of male sexual desire.” The question Perry poses in connection to this work is whether artistic processes can mediate social and sexual politics. For me, however, this work raises another interesting question: how is gender being used as visual shorthand?
I fully agree with Perry that Matisse is able to use technique to disrupt reading this work as purely one of sexual objectification or male eroticism. However, this reading cannot be disrupted without existing as an initial assumption provided by the presence of female nudes. The female nude provides a ready-made discourse that tends to imply the same categories of interrogation. Thus this “female shorthand” freezes the notion of the female body in a specific set of meanings and discourse continuing to convey the same readings and associations in a manner that inhibits new interpretations.
For example, in discussing this work Perry speaks first of the male gaze and then of the sexual nature of the poses. Although Perry is by no means characterizing the work solely in terms of these elements or even suggesting that they are the primary themes of the works, the need to address such elements time and again seemingly conflicts with her notion that abstraction disrupts such discourse.
To me, the abstraction in this context suggests the assertion of the male artist as he can now control the body of the female. Thus, the use of the female body as a form of visual short hand permits the artist to present the same ideologies and associations and emphasize the modernity of the technique rather than the subject matter. In other words, the use of the female nude acts as Matisse’s acknowledgement of his familiarity with the traditional art historical canon while his technique demonstrates his innovations as an artist. In this manner, this work becomes more about the emancipation of the male artist than it does of the female figures suggesting that abstraction does not truly disrupt traditional discourse.
 Gill Perry, ed., Gender and Art (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1999), 202.
 “Primitivism and the Modern” by Gill Perry from: Primitivism, Cubism and Abstraction: The Early Twentieth Century. The Open University, 1993, p 54.
 Gill Perry, ed., Gender and Art (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1999), 205.
 Gill Perry, ed., Gender and Art (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1999), 205.
Image source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luxe,_Calme_et_Volupt%C3%A9:
Posted in Academy, Blog Post, Gender, Historical Approach, Identity, Visual Shorthand
Tagged Fauve, Female Figure, Gaze, Gill Perry, Henri Matisse, Male Gaze, Nature, Nude, odalisque, pastoral, Roles
Paula-Modersohn-Becker, a German artist born on February 6, 1876 joined the Worpswede community of artists in 1899. The Worpswede community consisted mainly of former German art students who had become frustrated with their respective art Academies. In such an environment, Modersohn-Becker worked alongside male artists and as a woman artist enjoyed much more artistic agency than she could have elsewhere. Despite such relative freedom her work was not always well-received and as a woman artist she struggled to be taken
Paula Modersohn-Becker "Self Portrait with Amber Necklace", 1906
seriously. Modersohn-Becker completed a number of self-portraits that addressed the difficulties she faced as a female artist and her 1906 “Self-Portrait with Amber Necklace” demonstrates how such tensions manifested themselves in her work.
In this self-portrait, the artist has chosen to depict herself nude from the waist up in a full frontal position, filling the frame in an almost confrontational manner. Her skin takes on a pinkish hue that is echoed in the pink flowers she wears in her hair and holds in her hands. In addition, these mimic the shape of her nipples which are in turn emphasized by the use of a deeper pink. The warm hues of her torso are complemented by the lush forest-green flora in the background. Her connection to this natural setting is further strengthened by the thick amber necklace that adorns her chest. Attention is drawn to her head which is deliberately contrasted to the rest of body through the use of deep reds and oranges that feature bluish undertones as well as through an enlarging of her features and her eyes in particular. Although the nudeness of her body conveys sexuality, its sheer monumentality asserts itself within the frame. The emphasis on her head reinforces her consciousness as subject and not object demonstrating awareness of own existence as well as that of the viewer.
By painting herself in the nude, Modersohn-Becker co-opted the subject matter of many of her male contemporaries- the female nude – in a manner that relied on the typical associations made with such works while at the same time undermining them. Painting the female nude was a staple of male artists who used the female figure to demonstrate their own skill and creative energy. Similarly, self-portraits served as the primary means of identifying oneself as an artist worth admiring. By combining these two subjects into one work Modersohn-Becker regains ownership of the female body while asserting herself as a both a woman and an artist.
 “Primitivism and the Modern” by Gill Perry from : Primitivism, Cubism and Abstraction: The Early Twentieth Century. The Open University, 1993. P. 43.
Image Source: http://www.brooklynmuseum.org/eascfa/dinner_party/heritage_floor/paula_modersohn_becker.php
Posted in Feminist Art History, Gender, Identity, Self-Portrait, The Female Artist
Tagged Female Figure, Flora, Nature, Nudity, Paula Modersohn-Becker, Subversive, Worpswede