By Christopher Inkpen, RTI International
The issue of immigration and crime has become ubiquitous in recent media, although attention tends to focus on the impact that immigration may have on crime in the United States. While the research is not without caveats, current studies find an inverse relationship between immigration and crime or no relationship at all [1–3]. Yet the link between crime and migration is an important one in the countries from which people are leaving.
The decision to migrate is complex and can be the result of competing and complementary individual, household, and community factors.[4–8] Given the uncertainty involved in choosing to migrate, research has connected the decision to migrate with riskier attitudes and behaviors. In Latin America, studies have shown that having been the victim of a crime (or having a victim as a family member) is linked to higher desires to migrate. Popular narratives posit that expansion of drug cartels have spurred this migration. In fact some research connects drug-related homicides to municipal population declines, but empirical studies that attempt to link crime and the expansion of drug cartels to increases in migration often fail to identify a causal link. This study seeks to explain how crime and the presence of gangs in the Northern Triangle are associated with migration. Specifically, does being the victim of a crime or suffering from gang violence relate to a desire to migrate? Further, this study examines if this relationship is constant across the triangle and how it is spread across space.
Victimization, Gang Violence, and Intentions to Migrate – What the Data Tell Us
The data to answer these questions come from the Latin American Public Opinion Project, AmericasBarometer survey, which is a public opinion poll fielded throughout Latin America and the Caribbean, covering topics of security, crime, victimization, and confidence in public institutions among others. This study looks at the three countries in the Northern Triangle, examining how a person’s desire to migrate is built through their lived experience and querying if they have been a victim of a crime and if they feel gangs affect their daily life.
Table 1 shows the weighted distribution of these responses by country. While responses vary by country, roughly 1 in 3 people across the Northern Triangle considered migrating in the near future. Moreover, roughly 1 in 4 people had been the personal victim of a crime and between 1 and 2 out of every 10 respondents indicated that gang presence in their neighborhood affected daily life. This study now turns to an analysis of the relationships between these measures.
|Country||Number of Respondents||Percentage of Sample||Intentions to Migrate||Victimization||Gang Presence|
|Source: Latin American Public Opinion Project (LAPOP), Americas Barometer Survey, 2016/17. Data have been weighted using post-stratification weights provided by LAPOP.|
Table 1: Descriptive Statistics by Country
Understandably, there are a number of factors that explain someone’s desire to migrate, and having been the victim of a crime is just one. To isolate the relationship between desire to migrate and our questions of interest, this investigation uses statistical techniques that account for variation explained by other measures. To that end, this study attempts to control for all the factors that are generally considered important in influencing the decision to migrate. For example, models include sociodemographic variables, such as sex, education, employment, household income, and characteristics of residence, such as urbanicity. To understand how personal connections to migrants can influence plans to migrate, models account for whether or not the person receives remittances, or money sent from relatives or friends living and working in a foreign country. Lastly, this analysis looks at dissatisfaction with one’s country, including responses from a series of economic and security questions.
When controlling for all other measures, the relationship between victimization and migration in the Northern Triangle is very much positive. That is to say, people in the sample who were the victim of a crime within the past year were nearly twice as likely to report that they intended to leave their country, compared to those who were not victims. Being the victim of a crime was one of the most impactful factors linked with intentions to migrate, but this effect was different across countries. In fact, victims in El Salvador were also nearly twice as likely to say they planned to emigrate, compared to those in the rest of the region.
Gang presence was also an important predictor of intentions to migrate, as respondents who lived in gang-affected neighborhoods were 1.4 times as likely to express a desire to leave their country compared to those in safer neighborhoods. Moreover, this “gang effect” was stronger in El Salvador and Honduras compared to Guatemala.
Do Place and Space Matter?
To better understand how where one lives influences the desire to migrate, this analysis also includes aggregate municipal measures on intentions to migrate and levels of victimization. Exploratory analyses, shown in figure 1, suggest that municipalities with high levels of violence and high desires to migrate tend to be clustered together.
Implications and Next Steps
The implications for the region are clear – as long as insecurity and gang presence affect peoples’ lives, emigration will continue to be a palatable option. RTI International is currently working in the region with Duke University to better understand the myriad of factors that push and pull people from the Northern Triangle, as well as how mass deportation can impact communities in these countries. Research and evidence-backed violence prevention programs are essential to understanding how violence and out-migration will continue to affect these countries. Future research will look at how community-level factors of violence, gang presence, and responses to these issues can influence personal migration decisions.
- Lee, M. T., & Martinez, R. (2009). Immigration reduces crime: an emerging scholarly consensus. In W. Mcdonald (Ed.), Immigration, Crime and Justice (Sociology of Crime, Law and Deviance, Volume 13) (pp. 3–16). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
- Bucerius, S. (2012). Immigrants and Crime. In M. Tonry (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Ethnicity, Crime, and Immigration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Ousey, G. C., & Kubrin, C. E. (2018). Immigration and Crime: Assessing a Contentious Issue. Annual Review of Criminology, 1(1), 63–84.
- Stark, O., & Bloom, D. (1985). The New Economics of Labor Migration. The American Economic Review, 75(2), 173–178.
- Haug, S. (2008). Migration Networks and Migration Decision-Making. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 34(4), 585–605.
- Fussell, E., & Massey, D. S. (2004). The Limits to Cumulative Causation: International Migration From Mexican Urban Areas. Demography, 41(1), 151–171.
- Kandel, W., & Massey, D. S. (2002). The Culture of Mexican Migration: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis. Social Forces, 80(3), 981–1004.
- Tucker, C. M., Torres-Pereda, P., Minnis, A. M., & Bautista-Arredondo, S. A. (2013). Migration Decision-Making Among Mexican Youth. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 35(1), 61–84.
- Jaeger, D. A., Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D., Sunde, U., & Bonin, H. (2010). Direct Evidence on Risk Attitudes and Migration. Review of Economics and Statistics, 92(3), 684–689.
- Wood, C. H., Gibson, C. L., Ribeiro, L., & Hamsho-Diaz, P. (2010). Crime Victimization in Latin America and Intentions to Migrate to the United States. International Migration Review, 44(1), 3–24.
- Contreras, V. R. (2014). The Role of Drug-Related Violence and Extortion in Promoting Mexican Migration: Unexpected Consequences of a Drug War. Latin American Research Review, 49(3), 199–217.
- Basu, S., & Pearlman, S. (2017). Violence and migration: evidence from Mexico’s drug war. IZA Journal of Development and Migration, 7(1), 18.
- AmericasBarometer. (2016).