I am a theorist working on Quantum Information and Computation.
Currently, I am an assistant professor at Duke University. I have a joint appointment (50/50) at the departments of Physics & Electrical and Computer Engineering.
All my papers can be found here .
Current Group Members
 Austin Hulse (Ph.D. Student)
 Shiv Akshar Yadavalli (Ph.D. Student)
 Hanqing Liu (Ph.D. Student advised by Prof. Shailesh Chandrasekharan)
 Namit Anand (PostdocStarting Fall 2022)
 Plato Deliyannis (Ph.D. StudentStarting Fall 2022)
 Yash Chitgopekar (Ph.D. StudentStarting Fall 2022)
Research Interests
The theory of quantum information and quantum computation is an interdisciplinary field at the boundary of physics, engineering, and computer science. On the one hand, it looks at the fundamental limits of nature on computation and communication, and on the other hand, it studies more practical questions, such as how to overcome decoherence and build a faulttolerant quantum computer, or how to efficiently simulate the ground state and the dynamics of a manybody system. I have broad interests in Quantum Information Science (Read a short overview of this field).
I believe the revolution that happened in quantum information science in the last two decades, is going to have a profound influence on the rest of physics, and I am interested to work in this direction. In addition to this aspect of my research program, I am interested in all sorts of topics in quantum information science, from quantum algorithms and quantum cryptography, to open quantum systems, quantum error correction and quantum metrology.
Here are some of the topics I have worked on in the past:

Quantum Thermodynamics and Quantum Resource Theories
(Quantum Clocks, Quantum Reference frames, Coherence, Asymmetry,….)
Watch my talk on Distillation of Coherence and Quantum Clocks at QIP 2019 .
What is a Quantum Resource Theory?
If one looks at the scientific history of the theory of entanglement, the turning point is easily seen to occur in the midnineties, at the point when researchers in quantum information theory began to consider entanglement as “a resource as real as energy”. It gradually became clear that the entanglement theory should be understood as a framework to study questions about manipulating resource states for performing certain tasks, similar to the theory of thermodynamics. From this point on, entangled states and entangling operations were defined as those states and operations that cannot be implemented when one only has access to Local Operations and Classical Communication. Researchers then began to systematically answer questions such as: under this kind of restriction when is it possible to convert one resource state into another? How do we quantify the resource? What is the resource cost of simulating an operation? Subsequently, motivated by the success of the resource theory approach to entanglement, many researchers started applying this approach to understand other properties of quantum systems, such as coherence, asymmetry and athermality in quantum thermodynamics.
Related papers
 I. Marvian, Coherence distillation machines are impossible in quantum thermodynamics, Nature Communications (2020).
 I. Marvian, R.W. Spekkens, NoBroadcasting Theorem for Quantum Asymmetry and Coherence and a Tradeoff Relation for Approximate Broadcasting, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 020404 (2019).
 G. Gour, D. Jennings, F. Buscemi, R. Duan, I. Marvian, Quantum majorization and a complete set of entropic conditions for quantum thermodynamics, Nature Communications.
 I. Marvian and R. W. Spekkens, How to quantify coherence: Distinguishing speakable and unspeakable notions, Phys. Rev. A 94 , 052324 (2016 ), Editors’ Suggestion.
 I. Marvian and R. W. Spekkens, Extending Noether’s theorem by quantifying the asymmetry of quantum states, Nature Communications 5 , 3821 (2014 ), arXiv:1404.3236.
 A. Kolchinsky, I. Marvian, C. Gokler, Z. Liu, , P. Shor, O. Shtanko, K. Thompson, D.Wolpert, S. Lloyd, Maximizing free energy gain, arXiv:1705.00041.
 I. Marvian and R. W. Spekkens, The theory of manipulations of pure state asymmetry I: basic tools and equivalence classes of states under symmetric operations, New J. Phys. 15, 033001 (2013).
 I. Marvian and R. W. Spekkens, Modes of asymmetry: the application of harmonic analysis to symmetric quantum dynamics and quantum reference frames, Phys. Rev. A 90, 062110 (2014 ).

Local Symmetric Quantum Circuits and their applications
Watch my talk on Local Symmetric Circuits at QIP 2022 .
Overview:
According to a fundamental result in quantum computing, any unitary transformation on a composite system can be generated using socalled 2local unitaries that act only on two subsystems. Beyond its importance in quantum computing, this result can also be regarded as a statement about the dynamics of systems with local Hamiltonians: although locality puts various constraints on the shortterm dynamics, it does not restrict the possible unitary evolutions that a composite system with a general local Hamiltonian can experience after a sufficiently long time. In a recent paper, I have recently shown that this universality does not hold in the presence of conservation laws and global continuous symmetries: generic symmetric unitaries on a composite system cannot be implemented, even approximately, using local symmetric unitaries on the subsystems. Based on this nogo theorem, I propose a method for experimentally probing the locality of interactions in nature. In the context of quantum thermodynamics, our results mean that generic energyconserving unitary transformations on a composite system cannot be realized solely by combining local energyconserving unitaries on the components. I show how this can be circumvented via catalysis.
In two followup papers (here and here) with Hanqing Liu and Austin Hulse, we study the case of SU(d) symmetry for qudits. We show that in the case of d=2, i.e., qubits with SU(2) symmetry, any rotationallyinvariant unitary on qubits can be realized using the Heisenberg exchange interaction, which is 2local and rotationallyinvariant, provided that the qubits in the system interact with a pair of ancilla qubits. Our results reveal a significant distinction between the cases of d = 2 and d>2. For qubits with SU(2) symmetry, arbitrary global rotationallyinvariant unitaries can be generated with 2local ones, up to relative phases between the subspaces corresponding to inequivalent irreducible representations (irreps) of the symmetry, i.e., sectors with different angular momenta. On the other hand, for d>2, in addition to similar constraints on the relative phases between the irreps, locality also restricts the generated unitaries inside these conserved subspaces. These constraints impose conservation laws that hold for dynamics under 2local SU(d)invariant unitaries, but are violated under general SU(d)invariant unitaries. Based on this result, we show that the distribution of unitaries generated by random 2local SU(d)invariant unitaries does not converge to the Haar measure over the group of all SU(d)invariant unitaries, and in fact, for d>2, is not even a 2design for the Haar distribution.
Furthermore, we show that any rotationallyinvariant unitary on qubits can be realized using Heisenberg interaction, provided that the system can interact with a pair of ancilla qubits.
Related papers
 I. Marvian, Restrictions on realizable unitary operations imposed by symmetry and locality, Nature Physics 18, 283–289 (2022).
 I. Marvian, H. Liu, and A. Hulse, Qudit circuits with SU(d) symmetry: Locality imposes additional conservation laws, arXiv:2105.12877 (2021).
 I. Marvian, H. Liu, and A. Hulse, RotationallyInvariant Circuits: Universality with the exchange interaction and two ancilla qubits, arXiv:2202.01963 (2022).

Quantum Algorithms and Learning theory
Watch my talk on Universal Quantum Emulator at TQC 2019 .
Selected papers
 A. Steffens, P. Rebentrost, I. Marvian, J. Eisert, S. Lloyd, An efficient quantum algorithm for spectral estimation, New J. Phys. 19 (3 ), 033005 (2017 ), arXiv:1609.08170 .
 P. Rebentrost, A Steffens, I. Marvian, S. Lloyd, Quantum singularvalue decomposition of nonsparse lowrank matrices, Physical review A 97 (1), 012327 (2018).

I. Marvian and S. Lloyd, Universal Quantum Emulator, arXiv:1606.02734.

Quantum Error Suppression for Adiabatic Quantum Computation, Open Quantum systems
Selected papers
 I. Marvian and D. A. Lidar, Quantum speed limits for leakage and decoherence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 , 210402 (2015 ), arXiv:1505.07850 .
 I. Marvian and D. A. Lidar, Quantum error suppression with commuting Hamiltonians: Twolocal is too local , Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 , 260504 (2014 ), arXiv:1410.5487.

I. Marvian, Exponential suppression of decoherence and relaxation of quantum systems using energy penalty, arXiv:1602.03251.

SymmetryProtected topological order
and computational phases of matter
Selected papers
 I. Marvian, SymmetryProtected Topological Entanglement, Phys. Rev. B 95 , 045111 (2017 ), arXiv:1307.6617.

Quantum Speed Limits and Uncertainty relations
Selected papers

I. Marvian, R.W. Spekkens, and Paolo Zanardi, Quantum speed limits, coherence and asymmetry, Phys. Rev. A 93 , 052331 (2016 ), Editors’ Suggestion, arXiv:1510.06474.

I. Marvian and D. A. Lidar, Quantum speed limits for leakage and decoherence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 , 210402 (2015 ), arXiv:1505.07850 .

P. Coles, V. Katariya, S. Lloyd, I. Marvian, M. Wilde, Entropic EnergyTime Uncertainty Relation, arXiv:1805.07772.
Previous Positions
I completed my PhD in Physics in October 2012 at the University of Waterloo and Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics in Waterloo, Ontario. My PhD thesis is titled Symmetry, Asymmetry and Quantum Information, and is available here. After PhD, I worked at the University of Southern California (Nov 2012Aug 2015) and MIT (Sept 2015Dec 2017) as postdoctoral researcher. I joined Duke university as an assistant professor in January 2018.