How Six Interdisciplinary Graduate Student Groups Used Their D-SIGN Grants in 2018-19

D-SIGN grantees.

Background

Together Duke, the university’s 2017 academic strategic plan, includes a goal to provide a transformative educational experience for all students and sets forth increased opportunities for graduate and professional school students to prepare for a wide array of career options.

One of these opportunities is Duke Support for Interdisciplinary Graduate Networks (D-SIGN). By enabling graduate students to build or extend their networks and to integrate collaborative, cross-school experiences into their programs, D-SIGN increases the number of individuals whose graduate training reflects Duke’s commitment to interdisciplinarity and knowledge in the service of society. Such experiences deepen our students’ exposure to interdisciplinary collaboration, key preparation for both academic positions and nonacademic career trajectories.

For the 2018-2019 academic year, a January 2018 request for proposals invited all current Duke graduate students to propose an interdisciplinary project, training, or experience lasting up to a year. Proposals were reviewed by an ad hoc committee convened by the Vice Provost for Interdisciplinary Studies with representation from faculty, institute directors, and graduate students.

2018-2019 D-SIGN Recipients

Six groups received 2018-2019 D-SIGN grants, forming the third cohort of D-SIGN recipients. The 23 student organizers came from Arts & Sciences, Pratt School of Engineering, Nicholas School of the Environment, Divinity School, and the Sanford School of Public Policy. Nineteen were doctoral students; four were master’s students. The average award was $9,210.

GroupPurposeStudent OrganizersFaculty Sponsor(s)
Duke-ACRE PartnershipAddress wastewater treatment in Lowndes County; evaluate strategies to address the problem and creatively represent the human face of the issueKatherine Pringle, M.A. in Economics; Ryan Juskus, Ph.D. in Religion; Emma Lietz Bilecky, M.E.M.Erika Weinthal
Fostering Community Participation in the ArtsPromote equal role between creator and community member; present four performative works to Duke and Durham communities James Budinich and Brooks Frederickson, Ph.D. in Music Composition; Rebecca Uliasz, Ph.D. in Computational Media, Arts, and CulturesScott Lindroth and Bill Seaman
Riding the Belt and RoadIgnite discussion among students and faculty members on multiple facets of China’s new Belt Road Initiative, with a focus on environmental impactsYating Li and Seth Morgan, Ph.D. in Environmental Policy; Travis Dauwalter, Ph.D. in Public Policy; Zainab Qazi and Santiago Sinclair Lecaros, M.E.M.Billy Pizer, Elizabeth Losos, Indermit Gill, and Kathinka Fürst
Social Science Methods NetworkCreate an environment in which graduate students working on social scientific projects can engage in methodological debates and collaboration as they work on turning research findings into publishable outputs Valerie-Jean Soon and Kobi Finestone, Ph.D. in Philosophy; Peng Peng, Ph.D. in Political ScienceKevin Hoover and Timur Kuran
Theology, Religion, and Qualitative Methods NetworkEmploy methodological tools from the social sciences to better understand how cultural groups talk about holy figures and navigate ritual engagement with the sacredMichael Grigoni, Emily Dubie, and Ryan Juskus, Ph.D. in Religion; Dustin Benac and Sarah Jobe, Th.D.Luke Bretherton
Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Interdisciplinary Network of Graduate Students (WaSHINGS)Establish a platform allowing engineers, policy makers, educators, and entrepreneurs to share their perspectives and collaborate on strategies to improve water sanitationLucas Rocha Melogno, Stewart Farling, Siddharth Kawadiya, Billy Gerhard, and Brandon Hunter, Ph.D. in Civil and Environmental Engineering; James Thostenson, Ph.D. in Electrical and Computer EngineeringMarc Deshusses

Selected Activities and Accomplishments

Fostering Community Participation in the Arts

On October 19 and 20, 2018, musicologist Kerry O’Brien from Cornish College of the Arts visited Duke to discuss the work of American composer Pauline Oliveros. O’Brien presented an on-campus lecture based on her New Yorker article “Listening as Activism: The ‘Sonic Meditations’ of Pauline Oliveros.”

Yoga studio.O’Brien also co-led an afternoon of Oliveros’ Sonic Meditations and Deep Listening exercises with Duke New Music Ensemble Director Brooks Frederickson at Global Breath yoga studio in downtown Durham. Participants breathed, moved, sang, and played instruments together in an event that blurred the line between performer and audience member.

In January 2019, the group’s events included workshopping and performing improvisation-based works, written by Duke undergraduate and graduate students, as well as a world premiere by Stephanie Griffin. Griffin and Hilliard Greene, visiting artists for these events, joined the Duke New Music Ensemble in preparing these pieces. Griffin, who has a classically trained background, and Greene, a jazz musician, also discussed their own approaches to improvisation, and how they perform together as a viola-bass duo in their talk at the Rubenstein Arts Center.

At Arcana in downtown Durham, the group hosted a collaboration with three local visual artists (Sydney Steen, Erin Canady, and Leah Smith), who created visual works that the Duke New Music Ensemble interpreted as sound.

Margaret Schedel’s April visit began with a public hands-on DIY electronic instrument-building workshop, led in collaboration with Matthew Blessing. A musical group of undergraduate, MFA, and Ph.D. students then presented Schedel’s work with the newly constructed instruments the following day at The Mothership.

A free culminating event, “Immersive Engagements,” will take place on October 12 at the Living Arts Collective (410 W. Geer St., Durham, doors open at 7:30 p.m., show starts at 8:00 p.m.).

Our first three sets of events have been extremely successful in building connections between Duke students and community members. Our approach of connecting with community partners has proved fruitful; the local venues have supported our artistic endeavors and connected us with their regular clientele, and working with local artists have built artistic connections in our local community.

— James Budinich

Riding the Belt and Road

Catalyzed by a D-SIGN grant in 2018-2019 and housed at the Duke University Energy Initiative, the Riding the Belt and Road network ignited discussions among students and faculty members on multiple facets of China’s Belt Road Initiative, including its historical and geopolitical background, financial arrangement, business practices, and impacts on environment, energy, and development.

Kickoff meeting.

On September 7, 2018, more than 60 students and faculty members attended the kick-off event. The presenters included Jackson Ewing, Lydia Olander, Elizabeth Losos, Seth Morgan, Sara Mason, Erik Myxter-lino, Xiaolan You, Zainab Qazi, and Yating Li, covering a wide range of perspectives including roads and power plants, ecosystem impact, a framework to understand what leads to greener projects, and the implication of machine learning techniques to identify infrastructure.

The network hosted an event with Mia Bennett from the University of Hong Kong, who discussed how the BRI can be studied from space. With the Center for International and Global Studies, the network cohosted a conversation with Charles Stevens, cofounder of The New Silk Road Project. With support from the Nicholas Institute, the group brought together Ariel BenYishay from the College of William and Mary and Rebecca Ray from Boston University to discuss how to construct a sustainable future.

In October 2018, the network supported three graduate students to attend the Duke-DKU International Symposium on Environmentally and Socially Responsible Outbound Foreign Direct Investment, held at Duke Kunshan University. Building on the discussion, Elizabeth Losos and Lydia Olander from the Nicholas Institute proposed an international institutional collaboration, Gateway for Sustainable Infrastructure. The network supported a follow-up workshop on April 17, 2019, to further the discussion on areas of collaboration among key participants around the world.

The network also supported one group masters project, one individual masters project, and one Ph.D. dissertation chapter.

The purpose of building a network, unlike a research project, is to provide support and create linkages. On a cutting-edge topic like BRI, there are many ongoing research projects across the campus – both at Duke and at DKU, but researchers – graduate students and faculty members alike – do not always have the time and efforts to be connected and to benefit from others’ perspectives. Our network fills this gap and connects the dots.

— Yating Li

Theology, Religion, and Qualitative Methods Network

The network brought together graduate students from the Divinity School and Duke’s graduate programs in Religion, Sociology, and History to enhance collaboration in the use of qualitative methods by humanists and theologians. Participants gathered monthly to discuss practical concerns related to methods such as participant-observation and qualitative interviewing, and the possibilities and challenges that emerge from the use of such methods.

Dinner meeting.Each meeting focused on a set of texts that address the use of qualitative methods from a variety of disciplinary perspectives. Two initial readings framed the conversation: Jon Bialecki’s “Anthropology and Theology in Parallax” outlines the ethnographic turn among theologians from the perspective of a leading anthropologist, and Frédéric Vandenberghe’s “Sociology as Practical Philosophy and Moral Science” considers the possibility of a moral sociology.

Jon Bialecki joined the network via Skype to discuss his A Diagram for Fire: Miracles and Variation in an American Charismatic Movement. Todd Whitmore, a key figure in the ethnographic turn in theology, joined the network for a discussion of his Imitating Christ in Magwi: An Anthropological Theology in the context of a lunch workshop.

In concert with Whitmore’s visit, the network extended its reach to Duke’s broader academic community by hosting a panel discussion on March 29, 2019, which considered the history and promise of qualitative approaches for theological research and inquiry. Titled “Looking Back, Looking Forward: Reflections on Theology and the Social Sciences,” this panel was moderated by Luke Bretherton (Divinity School) and featured reflections from David Eagle (Duke Global Health Institute), Jan Holton (Divinity School), and Todd Whitmore (University of Notre Dame).

Panelists and participants considered prospects for convergence and exchange between theologians and social scientists. Panelists spoke optimistically of using qualitative methods to raise theological questions and develop constructive theological proposals. The event was featured on the website of The Network for Ecclesiology & Ethnography.

Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Interdisciplinary Network of Graduate Students (WaSHINGS)

This new student organization hosted a series of seminars with speakers to engage with the greater Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene (WaSH) community. Around 20 graduate students from the Nicholas School of the Environment, Sanford School of Public Policy, and the Pratt School of Engineering regularly attended the group’s events.

Brian Hawkins talked about the development of novel sanitation technologies at the Center for WASH-AID at Duke, including rapid deployment and appropriate scaling practices. Marc Deshusses shared highlights from his research group, including several projects in WaSH.  Jackie MacDonald Gibson shared her career path that led her to use her STEM background to guide policy-making at the national and international level. Marc Jeuland showed the importance of economic and behavior analyses for successful WaSH technology implementation. Finally, Jeffrey Piascik held an interview-style seminar during which he shared how his work experience outside of academia shaped his approach to WaSH challenges as the president of Biomass Controls, LLC.

Brandon Hunter.The group also conducted a drinking water quality assessment at a predominately African-American community in North Carolina. Despite being surrounded by municipal water distribution lines, this community relies on well water for its supply and on-site septic tanks for sanitation needs. Through a collaboration with the University of North Carolina – Chapel Hill, an IRB protocol was drafted and approved and water samples were taken from the community.

The researchers tested the samples for fecal indicator microorganisms and antimicrobial resistance, and identified pollution sources through microbial source tracking. The results will be shared with the community, and a scientific manuscript will be drafted by December 2019.

Looking Ahead: 2019-2020 Grantees

Two graduate student groups received D-SIGN grants for use in 2019-2020. The nine student organizers came from Arts & Sciences, Law, Medicine, Nicholas School of the Environment, and Pratt School of Engineering. Seven are doctoral students, one is a master’s student, and one is a J.D. student. The average award was $9,780.

Learn More

Download this report as a PDF. For more information, please visit the D-SIGN page on our website or contact the Office of the Vice Provost for Interdisciplinary Studies (216 Allen Building, 919-684-1964, interdisciplinary@duke.edu).

Graduate Network Catalyzes Research on China’s Belt and Road Initiative

Kickoff event.
Kick-off event for the Riding the Belt and Road network on September 7, 2018

China’s Belt and Road Initiative is a mammoth undertaking that seeks to establish a “new Silk Road” linking China with over 60 countries in Asia, Africa, and Europe. Last spring, five Duke graduate students received a Duke Support for Interdisciplinary Graduate Networks (D-SIGN) grant to establish Riding the Belt and Road. The group aimed to ignite a discussion among students and faculty members on multiple facets of the Belt Road Initiative, with a focus on environmental impacts. Below are excerpts from their report.

Catalyzed by a D-SIGN grant in 2018-2019 and housed at the Duke University Energy Initiative, the Riding the Belt and Road network we built together has ignited discussions among students and faculty members on multiple facets of BRI, including its historical and geopolitical background, financial arrangement, business practices and impacts on environment, energy, and development in general.

Our network complements and extends existing BRI efforts led by faculty members, especially from the Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions, supports students to attend BRI workshop and conferences, and offers the platform for students to present and get feedback for their own research projects related to BRI. Our network leverages the existing website on the Belt and Road Initiative hosted by the website of the Center for International & Global Studies (DUCIGS).

“The purpose of building a network, unlike a research project, is to provide support and create linkages. On a cutting-edge topic like BRI, there are many ongoing research projects across the campus – both at Duke and at DKU, but researchers – graduate students and faculty members alike – do not always have the time and efforts to be connected and to benefit from others’ perspectives. Our network fills this gap and connects the dots.”

Yating Li, Ph.D. student in Environmental Economics

Our network raised awareness and initiated conversations around the BRI issues within the Duke community by providing a platform to share research progress for Duke graduate students and faculty members and by inviting world-renowned researchers to give talks and hold discussions with students.

Mia Bennett.
Mia Bennett

On September 7, over 60 students and faculty members attended our kick-off event. The presenters included Jackson Ewing, Lydia Olander, Elizabeth Losos, Seth Morgan, Sara Mason, Erik Myxter-lino, Xiaolan You, Zainab Qazi, and Yating Li, covering a wide range of perspectives including roads and power plants, ecosystem impact, a framework to understand what leads to greener projects, and the implication of machine learning techniques to identify infrastructure.

With DUCIGS, we cohosted a lunch conversation with Charles Stevens, cofounder of The New Silk Road Project.

We hosted Mia Bennett, Assistant Professor at the University of Hong Kong. She discussed how the BRI can be studied from space using remote sensing, specifically nighttime-light imagery.

With support from the Nicholas Institute, we brought together Ariel BenYishay from the College of William and Mary and Rebecca Ray from Boston University to discuss how we can construct a sustainable future.

“The opportunity to meet Dr. BenYishay and Dr. Ray was particularly beneficial for me and other graduate students who interacted with them. Dr. BenYishay discussed his work with AidData at length and spent time fielding questions from students both during the panel and afterward in an informal graduate student session. This event is one example of the ways in which Riding the Belt and Road was instrumental in helping me form research questions related to sustainable infrastructure and rural development. The network has been a key sounding board as I have explored the data requirements for my research and contributed to policy reports on the impacts of roads on forests.”

Seth Morgan, Ph.D. student in Environmental Policy

In October 2018, the network supported three graduate students to attend the Duke-DKU International Symposium on Environmentally and Socially Responsible Outbound Foreign Direct Investment, hosted at Duke Kunshan University, China. A set of events over five days addressed how to understand and plan for China’s vast increase in infrastructure investment abroad, especially for projects that are part of the BRI.

“My participation at the conferences gave me professional contacts and access to cutting-edge researchers in the field. Furthermore, the opportunity assisted greatly in my master’s project that focused on Chinese state-owned enterprises’ internationalization process in the Belt and Road era.” He adds, “Being a part of Riding the Belt and Road D-SIGN group was one of the main highlights of my graduate school experience as it expanded my intellectual capacity to look at my specific subfield of research interests through the lens of disciplines I had limited exposure to prior.”

Erik Myxter-lino, research assistant at the Nicholas Institute and graduate student at NC State University

Building on the discussion during the October workshop, an international institutional collaboration – Gateway for Sustainable Infrastructure – was proposed by Elizabeth Losos and Lydia Olander from the Nicholas Institute. Our network supported a follow-up workshop on April 17 to further the discussion on areas of collaboration among key participants around the world.

“We could have held a series of seminars and conferences on our own, but involving the graduate students from the Riding the Belt and Road D-SIGN network greatly enhanced our programs in several ways. Most immediately, the D-SIGN group actively promoted the programs and encouraged their classmates to participate. But the group also helped mold our research directions by active involvement in discussions of research and workshop agendas, selection of speakers, and critiques of masters projects. These graduate students were full colleagues in every sense. I look forward to continuing to work with many of them while they are still at Duke and hopefully beyond.”

Elizabeth Losos, Senior Fellow at the Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions

The network supported one group masters project, one individual masters project, and one Ph.D. dissertation chapter.

  • Jiaxin Guo, Mya Nwe, Zainab Qazi, Shuyi Zhou, “Assessing the Environmental Sustainability Potential of BRI Countries under the Five Connectivities Framework”
  • Erik Myxter-lino, “State-owned Enterprises within the Belt and Road Initiative: Conducting the State’s Business or Conducting Business with the State’s Assistance?”
  • Yating Li, “Environmental Impact of Overseas Coal-fired Power Plants Financed by China”

“The BRI network at Duke has been an invaluable source of mentoring for our Master’s Project. Our group focused on assessing the environmental sustainability potential of BRI recipient countries conducive to keeping the BRI projects green vis-à-vis the Chinese overseas investments. In particular, our Master’s Project used China’s Five Connectivities framework to assess the varied capacities of BRI participants as countries with distinct sociopolitical and economic contexts and the subsequent bilateral ties with China. We hope that our project serves as a primary investigation into environmental sustainability assessment of the BRI countries and a stepping-stone for further case studies along different regional corridors.”

Zainab Qazi, Master of Environmental Management student

For the leaders, network participants, and the Duke community, our Riding the Belt and Road Network has been a gateway to understand the multiple facets of the Belt and Road Initiative. Our network’s success in this regard has been driven by the support of faculty members and staff from at least four key institutions: the Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions, the Center for International & Global Studies, the Duke University Energy Initiative, and the International Master of Environmental Policy (iMEP) at Duke Kunshan University.

In particular, we are grateful for the guidance and support provided by our faculty mentors: Professors Billy PizerElizabeth LososIndermit GillKathinka Fürst. We would also like to acknowledge research contributions by Fanqi (Vicky) Jia and Yingyu Fu. We are confident that, moving forward, the network we built will continue to facilitate discussions around BRI at Duke, galvanize interests in sustainable infrastructure, and support evidence-based planning of large-scale infrastructure projects.

Graduate Students Establish Networks for Environmental Justice and Molecular Simulation

First row: Brandon Hunter, Katy Hansen, Walker Grimshaw, Wen Wang, Elsa Haag; bottom row: Jonathon Yuly, Jesús Valdiviezo Mora, Jacob Lindale, Shannon Eriksson.

The Office of the Vice Provost for Interdisciplinary Studies has awarded Duke Support for Interdisciplinary Graduate Networks (D-SIGN) grants to two graduate student groups for 2019-2020.

Duke University Environmental Justice Network

  • Core students: Brandon Hunter, Ph.D. in Civil and Environmental Engineering; Katy Hansen, Ph.D. in Environmental Policy; Walker Grimshaw, M.E.M. (Duke) and M.S in Environmental Sciences and Engineering (UNC); Wen Wang, Ph.D. in Economics; Elsa Haag, J.D. in Law
  • Faculty mentor: Megan Mullin

This new network will be comprised of graduate and professional students committed to understanding and addressing environmental injustices in North Carolina, the U.S., and globally. Members will draw on theories from philosophy, political science, public policy, and sociology to analyze how actors and institutions shape the development, implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and policies. This D-SIGN grant supports the first collective effort by Duke graduate and professional students to address issues of environmental justice by supplementing academics, fostering collaborative research, and providing opportunities to develop a professional network. Activities will consist of journal reading club meetings, a seminar series from experts in the field, and interaction with local environmental justice organizations.

Triangle Molecular Simulation Society

  • Core students: Jonathon Yuly, Ph.D. in Physics; Jesús Valdiviezo Mora, Ph.D. in Chemistry; Jacob Lindale, Ph.D. in Chemistry; Shannon Eriksson, M.D./Ph.D. in Clinical Science/Chemistry
  • Faculty mentor: David N. Beratan

Molecular simulation is a staple of research for a number of disciplines in the natural sciences. Simulation techniques drive new research questions, automate molecular design, interpret experimental results, and create educational materials. Molecular simulation is routinely used to support efforts in drug discovery as well as energy sciences, both of which surround important societal problems that may characterize the 21st century. The core students of this D-SIGN grant aim to kickstart an interdisciplinary and cross-school network of students, researchers, enthusiasts, and members of industry interested in the methods and applications of molecular simulation. This network will eventually nurture research collaboration, support, and community within the Triangle area.

About Duke Support for Interdisciplinary Graduate Networks (D-SIGN)

This internal funding mechanism encourages graduate students to explore beyond disciplinary lines, both in research and coursework. The goal is to enable graduate students to build or extend their networks and to integrate collaborative, cross-school experiences into their programs, thereby increasing the number of individuals whose graduate training reflects Duke’s commitment to interdisciplinarity and knowledge in the service of society.

A January 2019 RFP invited all current Duke graduate students (including master’s, professional, and Ph.D. students) to propose interdisciplinary groups and activities. Proposals were reviewed by an ad hoc committee convened by the Executive Vice Provost and the Vice Provost for Interdisciplinary Studies, including representation from faculty, deans, institute directors, and graduate students.

Photos, first row: Brandon Hunter, Katy Hansen, Walker Grimshaw, Wen Wang, Elsa Haag; bottom row: Jonathon Yuly, Jesús Valdiviezo Mora, Jacob Lindale, Shannon Eriksson

Build or Extend Graduate Student Networks with D-SIGN Grants

D-SIGN.

Deadline: February 25, 2019

Opportunity

The goal of this internal grant competition is to enable graduate students to build or extend their networks and to integrate collaborative, cross-school experiences into their programs, thereby increasing the number of individuals whose graduate training reflects the university’s signature commitments to interdisciplinarity and knowledge in the service of society. We believe such experiences will lead to better preparation/training, whether for academic positions or other career trajectories.

Interdisciplinary Graduate Network Grants are available to graduate student groups to propose an interdisciplinary project, training, or experience lasting up to a year. Preference will be given to proposals that include participation across schools and that include professional students and well as doctoral students.

Proposals require a lead faculty sponsor who agrees to mentor the group; an organizational sponsor (preferably a department, school, or institute/initiative) willing to handle funds and provide logistical support; endorsement from an additional faculty member from a different discipline or school; a plan of work; and anticipated outcomes. Where appropriate, these activities should count toward curricular requirements.

Proposed projects or activities could include a year-long research team (e.g., on the Bass Connections model that incorporates undergraduates and engages with external partners such as community organizations); groups to explore a compelling theme or problem that cuts across disciplinary lines (e.g., a reading group, group independent study, dissertation writing group); a joint effort to construct an interdisciplinary course for undergraduates, etc. For reference, see previous awardees and project descriptions.

Eligibility

All current graduate students (post-undergraduate, including master’s, professional, and Ph.D. students) in any program at Duke University may propose interdisciplinary groups and activities.

Proposals

Proposals will be accepted from January 14 through February 25, 2019 at 5:00 p.m.

Proposal Requirements

The Provost‘s Office uses MyResearchProposal online application software to submit applications.

You will be asked to upload the following documents:

  • A brief narrative that articulates the plan of work, the proposed group, the goals of the network, and how it fits with your overall academic, research, and professional plans (no more than 3 pages)
  • A budget plan (up to $20,000), and timeline for use of the funds, and identification of the sponsoring unit (to manage the funds); we anticipate most budgets and awards will fall in the $5,000-$15,000 range. Note: Funds cannot be used for Ph.D. student support.
  • A listing of all other concurrent proposals for funding to support the proposed activities (we will ask awardees to update us when any additional funding for the proposed activities is awarded/received).
  • Letters or e-mails from the faculty sponsor, and an additional faculty member from a different discipline or school in support of the proposed network.

Instructions

  • Applicant instructions for applying via the MyResearchProposal software is available – Please review this document.
  • Enter Access Code ‘PROVOST’ then select the Provost – Duke Support for Interdisciplinary Graduate Networks, D-SIGN Application Spring 2019 opportunity and follow the instructions.
  • Letters of recommendation can be sent as PDFs to carolyn.mackman@duke.edu. Letters should be saved using the following format: Applicant Last Name_D-SIGN_Letter writer last name (e.g., a letter for Joey Young, written by Dr. A. Smith would be named: Young_D-SIGN_Smith).
  • For any questions concerning MyResearchProposal passwords or system issues, please contact Lesia O’Hara or Anita Grissom at myresearchproposal@duke.edu.

Timeline

RFP released 01/14/2019
RFP deadline for submission 02/25/2019
Project winner(s) notified 03/29/2019
Funds made available* 04/01/2019

*Funds must be expended between 4.1.19 and 6.30.20.

Contact

For any questions regarding your proposal, please contact: Carolyn Mackman, carolyn.mackman@duke.edu

Review and Selection

Proposals will be reviewed by an ad hoc committee convened by the Executive Vice Provost and the Vice Provost for Interdisciplinary Studies, to include representation from faculty, deans, institute directors, and graduate students, representing all divisions of knowledge. Decisions will be announced in March 2019. Awardees will be expected to provide updates on their activities during the year, which may include meeting with the Vice Provost for Interdisciplinary Studies.

Propose a Case Study on Global Energy Access for the Next GLEAN Publication

Deadline: January 31, 2019

The Global Energy Access Network (GLEAN) student organization is now accepting applications for the third volume of the Energy Access Case Studies publication. They are looking for students (undergraduate, graduate, postdoc, or professional) from any discipline who have engagement in the field of energy access.

Submit an application about your research, study abroad experience, internship, field work, or other engagement related to energy access in low-income or developing countries for a chance to publish a five-page study and win $200.

The submission deadline is January 31, 2019. Learn about the proposal application requirements.

See volume 2, read more about GLEAN, and see other D-SIGN grantees from 2017-18.

Duke Students Examine Sustainable Energy Solutions in New Volume of Case Studies

GLEAN case studies

What do dusty solar panels, biomass cookstoves, biogas-fueled sanitation systems, and renewable project finance have in common? Each is featured in a new volume of energy access case studies from Duke University student authors.

Case studies by Michael Valerino (PhD ’23, Environmental Engineering), Chinmoy Kumar (MIDP’19, Master of International Development Policy), Brandon Hunter (PhD’20, Environmental Engineering), and Thomas Klug (BA/BS’18, Public Policy and Environmental Science) feature insights from students’ fieldwork in Madagascar, India, and the Philippines.

Second volume of GLEAN case studies coverIt’s the second volume of case studies published by Duke University’s Global Energy Access Network (GLEAN), a student organization. GLEAN brings together graduate, professional, and undergraduate students across disciplines, affording opportunities to explore diverse perspectives on energy access issues and discuss relevant fieldwork experiences.

Heidi Vreeland (PhD’19, Environmental Engineering), editor of the second volume, first got involved with GLEAN during its inaugural year (2016-17), finding that its interdisciplinary approach immediately resonated with her. She shares, “At GLEAN meetings, I loved seeing how the same energy access topic could be interpreted by economic, policy, and science/engineering perspectives in different ways. Discussing these topics with those outside my field helped me synthesize a fuller picture.”

In the editing process, Vreeland observed how challenging it can be for students to “translate technical terms and convey field-specific language across disciplines.” Iterating on drafts with reviewers from four different departmental backgrounds helped student authors improve these skills by offering valuable feedback on how to improve clarity for a diverse audience.

Spanning fields like engineering, policy, finance, and health, the case studies’ findings offer rich insights for those advancing modern energy technologies and effective energy policy in the developing world:

  • Valerino’s case study discusses how the energy yield of photovoltaic cells can be compromised by poor air quality and what this could mean for countries like India that have intentions to increase reliance on solar energy but also suffer from high levels of air pollution.
  • Kumar reflects on how lessons from India can help other developing nations finance renewable energy projects in innovative ways.
  • Klug’s case study examines how reliance on traditional biomass fuel has affected a community in Madagascar.
  • Hunter, drawing on his experiences with on implementing biogas-fueled sanitation systems in the Philippines, demonstrates the importance of propagating suitable technologies that are robust and cater to the unique social and cultural needs of diverse communities.

The students first got involved in their fieldwork in a variety of ways, from Bass Connections to DukeEngage to faculty research, exemplifying how the larger energy community at Duke offers a myriad of student research opportunities.

Team of researchers from the Duke Lemur Center, including Thomas Klug (BA,BS’18, Public Policy and Environmental Science), and cookstove competition participants in Andapa, Madagascar. Photo: Thomas Klug.

Thomas Klug shares, “My work in Madagascar began with a Bass Connections project in spring 2016. I decided to return to Madagascar on a DukeEngage independent project grant in summer 2017 to work more closely with the Duke Lemur Center: SAVA Conservation (the branch of the Lemur Center in Madagascar that focuses on community-based conservation efforts). My work in Madagascar led me to work for the Sustainable Energy Transitions Initiative (SETI) based here at Duke, which is an international network of energy access researchers and practitioners that coordinates and supports new energy access research around the globe.”

Brandon Hunter’s case study builds off of his dissertation research, which has connections and support beyond Duke:

“In 2011, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation launched their Reinvent the Toilet Challenge, which aims to develop sustainable technological solutions to address the 2.4 billion people worldwide who do not have access to safe, cost effective sanitation. My advisor, Dr. Marc Deshusses, received this grant and established the Anaerobic Digestion Pasteurization Latrine (ADPL) concept, which is the basis for my dissertation research. Since 2012, the ADPL team has demonstrated that the concept is feasible in the laboratory and has implemented five full-scale ADPL field units in Kenya, India, and the Philippines. I serve as the Duke ADPL team liaison to our partners in the Philippines and oversee the operations of our systems there. My GLEAN case study was generated from observations of system implementation and user interaction in the Philippines.”

Graham Miller (far left) and Brandon Hunter (far right) of the Duke ADPL team pose with their collaborators from the Tesari Foundation (center) in front of the ADPL system in Baragay Subayon, Toledo City, Cebu, Philippines.

Each case study both builds on and furthers student research, coursework, and career explorations in energy. Chinmoy Kumar recognizes the interconnected challenges embedded within issues of energy access and sustainable technology, reflecting, “I realized that for several developing nations, the transition to renewable sources of energy is going to be difficult in view of the fact that they are constrained by availability of financing. Many of these projects would be risky and attracting cost-effective capital will pose a challenge for them. Therefore, there would be a need for innovation and financial engineering in the area of financing…in order to enable these projects to become viable.”

What will be the impact of these case studies at Duke and beyond? The authors see wide-ranging applications, but emphasize the centrality of context and human experience.

Hunter shares, “It is my hope that this information will lead to more efficient and effective engineered systems that more carefully consider the lived experience of its users. I hope that this case study will aid in preparing other engineering research design teams to develop their technologies with considerations for the specific environmental, economic, social, and cultural contexts in which their technology will ultimately be used.”

Brandon Hunter manually tests the igniter system that is used to burn the methane-rich biogas from the ADPL digesters.

Valerino hopes his research on photovoltaic soiling will support efforts to deploy renewable energy in developing countries, helping “allow large-scale, small-scale, and off-grid solar energy to be more efficient and feasible solutions to the energy crisis.” He recognizes the collective need for action, as well: “The challenge of energy access for the world has fallen onto our generation. It is a field that can really have tangible impact on peoples’ lives.”

The impact will surely have a ripple effect across campus and throughout the students’ academic pathways. Vreeland shares: “I hope this volume is informative to others who may be pursuing related work, and inspires people to share their own insights. Importantly, it is a great experience for students who are early on in their publishing careers to gain experience by iterating on drafts, responding to reviewer comments, and formatting documents and citations as one would for a journal.”

A research participant wearing an air quality monitoring backpack to measure personal exposure to air pollution while cooking (Mandena, Madagascar). Photo: Thomas Klug.

Growing Interest in Energy Access

Housed by the Duke University Energy Initiative, the Global Energy Access Network was financially supported in its first two years by the Office of the Vice Provost for Interdisciplinary Studies through its Duke Support for Interdisciplinary Graduate Networks (D-SIGN) grant program. In addition to publishing the second volume of case studies, GLEAN organized an Energy Access Speaker Series and curated an energy access photo contest and exhibit under the auspices of its 2017-2018 D-SIGN grant.

Faraz Usmani (PhD’19, Environmental Policy), an Energy Initiative Doctoral Student Fellow, has served as one of the coordinators of GLEAN and co-edited the first volume.

Usmani recognizes the growing movement of student interest and participation in issues of energy access at Duke, noting, “The international community has recognized the fundamental constraint that lack of access to energy imposes on inclusive growth and development. Duke is quickly moving to the fore of that global conversation. On campus, there have never been as many opportunities to learn about, engage with, and work toward solving the energy challenges faced by billions in low- and middle-income countries as there are now.”

Among the recent developments on campus has been the January 2018 launch of Duke’s Energy Access Project, a new research and policy effort that takes an interdisciplinary approach to developing market and policy solutions for the 1 billion who are still without electricity, another billion lacking reliable electricity, and the more than 3 billion people currently without access to clean cooking technologies. The project is a collaboration among the Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions, the Duke University Energy Initiative, the Sanford School of Public PolicyBass Connections, and the Nicholas School of the Environment.

To learn more about energy at Duke: Check out the Duke University Energy Initiative. As Faraz Usmani advises students, “The Energy Initiative serves as the unifying hub for all of this — if you have an idea, connect with the Initiative and make it happen.”

To join GLEAN: Duke students, contact one of the coordinators listed here or send an email to sympa@duke.edu with no subject and the following message: subscribe glean

Originally published on the Duke University Energy Initiative website

Images: GLEAN’s second volume of case studies, “Sustainable Energy & Technology,” was published in September 2018; Team of researchers from the Duke Lemur Center, including Thomas Klug (BA,BS’18, Public Policy and Environmental Science), and cookstove competition participants in Andapa, Madagascar (Photo: Thomas Klug); Graham Miller (far left) and Brandon Hunter (far right) of the Duke ADPL team pose with their collaborators from the Tesari Foundation (center) in front of the ADPL system in Baragay Subayon, Toledo City, Cebu, Philippines; Brandon Hunter manually tests the igniter system that is used to burn the methane-rich biogas from the ADPL digesters; A research participant wearing an air quality monitoring backpack to measure personal exposure to air pollution while cooking in Mandena, Madagascar (Photo: Thomas Klug)

Duke Support for Interdisciplinary Graduate Networks (D-SIGN) 2017-2018 Report

D-SIGN 2017-18 report

Background

Together Duke, the university’s 2017 strategic plan, includes a goal to provide a transformative educational experience for all students and sets forth increased opportunities for graduate and professional school students to prepare for a wide array of career options.

One of these opportunities is Duke Support for Interdisciplinary Graduate Networks (D-SIGN). By enabling graduate students to build or extend their networks and to integrate collaborative, cross-school experiences into their programs, D-SIGN increases the number of individuals whose graduate training reflects Duke’s commitment to interdisciplinarity and knowledge in the service of society. Such experiences deepen our students’ exposure to interdisciplinary collaboration, key preparation for both academic positions and nonacademic career trajectories.

D-SIGN grants are available to graduate student groups to propose an interdisciplinary project, training, or experience lasting up to a year. All current graduate students (including master’s, professional, and Ph.D. students) in any program at Duke University are eligible. Preference is given to proposals that include participation across schools and that include professional students as well as doctoral students.

Proposals require a lead faculty sponsor who agrees to mentor the group; an organizational sponsor (preferably a department, school or institute/initiative) willing to handle funds and provide logistical support; endorsement from an additional faculty member from a different discipline or school; a plan of work; and anticipated outcomes. Where appropriate, these activities should count toward curricular requirements.

This grant program began in 2016-2017; for more information about the first cohort, please see the 2016-2017 D-SIGN report.

Applicant Pool

For the 2017-2018 academic year, a January 2017 request for proposals (RFP) invited all current Duke graduate students to propose an interdisciplinary project, training, or experience lasting up to a year. We received 14 proposals, which were reviewed by an ad hoc committee convened by the Vice Provost for Interdisciplinary Studies with representation from faculty, institute directors, and graduate students.

2017-2018 D-SIGN Recipients

Six groups received 2017-2018 D-SIGN grants, forming the second cohort of D-SIGN recipients. The 16 student organizers (10 women and 6 men) came from Arts & Sciences, Pratt School of Engineering, Nicholas School of the Environment, Sanford School of Public Policy, and the Duke Global Health Institute. Twelve were doctoral students; four were master’s students. The average award was $8,605.

Group Purpose Student Organizers Faculty Sponsor(s)
Desarrolla México Help a rural community develop a renewable energy strategy and a business plan for its ecotourism business; advance a study on obstacles to reinvesting funds from Payments for Ecosystem Services programs Ruxandra Popovici, Ph.D. in Environment; Emilio Blanco Gonzalez and Adam Cullen, M. Eng. in Mechanical Engineering Elizabeth Shapiro-Garza
Global Energy Access Network (GLEAN) Elevate the prominence of the global energy access challenge on campus; foster an interdisciplinary community of graduate and professional students wanting to engage with this challenge in their work Yating Li and Faraz Usmani, Ph.D. in Environmental Policy; Muye Ru, Ph.D. in Earth and Ocean Sciences; Heidi Vreeland, Ph.D. in Civil and Environmental Engineering Subhrendu Pattanayak, Brian Murray
The Global South after 2010 Explore the aesthetics, ethics, and politics of transnational violence in the Global South; organize seminars and a graduate student conference Renée Michelle Ragin, Ph.D. in Literature; Giulia Riccò, Ph.D. in Romance Studies Deborah Jenson, miriam cooke
Lowndes County Sanitation Access Network Contribute to a community research project to improve wastewater treatment; diagnose the interlaced physical and financial barriers to sanitation access and evaluate potential solutions Emily Meza, M.E.M.; Katy Hansen, Ph.D. in Environmental Policy; Ryan Juskus, Ph.D. in Religion Erika Weinthal, Elizabeth Albright
Modeling Health & Environment Graduate Working Group Design an undergraduate course on systems thinking and modeling in health and environment; acquire system dynamics modeling skills as well as relevant subject matter knowledge on global health, the environment, and interconnections between the two Shashika Bandara, M.Sc. in Global Health; Varun Mallampalli, Ph.D. in Civil and Environmental Engineering Kevin A. Schulman, Mark Borsuk
Network to Enrich GALS Summer Science Program Improve the training of Girls on outdoor Adventures in Leadership and Science (GALS) leaders to strengthen a free summer camp for girls from underrepresented backgrounds to encourage them to pursue STEM fields Jacqueline Gerson, Ph.D. in Ecology; Emily Levy, Ph.D. in Biology Erika Weinthal, Nicolette Cagle, Naomi Kraut, Megan Mullin

Selected Activities and Accomplishments

Desarrolla México

Desarrollo Mexico

Playa Grande is a Mexican ejido, where land is jointly owned by a group of 70 community members. Residents participate in government-funded conservation programs where community members receive compensation in exchange for their involvement in the sustainable management and stewardship of natural resources. Playa Grande decided to invest its conservation program earnings into an ecotourism business, jointly owned by community members.

Ruxandra Popovici, a Ph.D. student in Environment, teamed up with Emilio Blanco Gonzalez and Adam Cullen, master’s students in Mechanical Engineering, to help this rural community develop a renewable energy strategy and a business plan for sustainable ecotourism. In the summer of 2017, the three graduate students traveled with undergraduate Matheus Dias to Playa Grande.

Cullen and Gonzalez evaluated three renewable energy options to power the tourist center, and recommended additional solar panels as the most cost-effective option. Community leaders have already acted on this recommendation.

Dias, an economics major, created a report documenting the community’s business structure and activities, which members can use to apply for loans and government grants. In addition, he conducted research on the region’s ecotourism market and provided suggestions for improving the ecotourism business and developing future services.

Popovici interviewed microentrepreneurs and facilitated a partnership with NC State’s P1tLab to provide guidance on the community’s marketing and business strategy. Learn more.

Global Energy Access Network (GLEAN)

GLEAN

The Global Energy Access Network (GLEAN) is an interdisciplinary group of more than 50 Duke graduate and professional students who aim to advance sustainable solutions to address the world’s energy access challenges. Housed at the Duke University Energy Initiative, GLEAN received a D-SIGN grant in 2016-17 and a follow-on grant in 2017-18. This year’s organizers were doctoral students Yating Li and Faraz Usmani (Environmental Policy), Muye Ru (Earth and Ocean Sciences), and Heidi Vreeland (Civil and Environmental Engineering).

Through the group’s Energy Access Speaker Series, GLEAN sponsored and organized the visits of Shu Tao (Peking University), Akanksha Chaurey (ITP India), and Jill Baumgartner (McGill University).

Expected to be ready by the end of Summer 2018, GLEAN’s second volume of case studies will present research takeaways from members on a diverse range of topics—from the implications of improving energy finance for India’s solar industry to measurement of the impacts of cleaner cooking technologies in rural Madagascar. The volume aims to inform researchers, practitioners, students, and others working on energy access and energy transitions.

Recognizing that visual media can highlight the reality of energy poverty in remote settings, GLEAN organized the ImaginEnergy Photo Contest and received over 40 submissions. Winners—selected via a social media campaign led by the Energy Initiative—displayed their photos as part of a DUU VisArts exhibition at Duke’s Brown Art Gallery. Their photos were also on display during the annual meeting of the Sustainable Energy Transitions Initiative (SETI) at Duke in May 2018. Learn more.

GLEAN members have contributed to a wide range of energy-relevant research applications across the world. The case studies collection will compile these experiences for policymakers, practitioners and researchers, who frequently find themselves ‘reinventing the wheel’ when engaging with unfamiliar contexts or communities.

—Heidi Vreeland

The Global South after 2010

Global South

Are there trends in the types of sociopolitical violence that have characterized social movements after the Arab Spring? How has this violence been represented in the media and in popular culture? What are the legal and political consequences of such representations? These questions fascinated doctoral students Renée Ragin (Literature) and Giulia Riccò (Romance Studies). Inviting other graduate students to join them in an interdisciplinary exploration, they created a working group called The Global South after 2010: Epistemologies of Militarization.

The group held three meeting in the fall and began coordinating with the Global South Lab at the Institute of the Humanities and Global Cultures at the University of Virginia. In collaboration with Sylvia Miller, director of the Publishing Humanities Initiative at the Franklin Humanities Institute, Ragin and Riccò organized a day-long symposium.

Invited to give a talk at UVA, Ragin and Riccò used the opportunity to pilot ideas for a cowritten research article and received positive feedback. In the spring, the group supported a Duke conference on Emergency Legal Cultures; hosted a workshop with Shahla Talebi and Diana Coleman from Arizona State University; and organized a two-day colloquium. One of the colloquium respondents, Duke Professor Michaeline Crichlow, offered the opportunity to curate a special issue of Cultural Dynamics: Insurgent Scholarship on Culture, Politics, and Power. Forthcoming in June 2019, “Epistemologies of Militarization in the Global South” will include two papers from the colloquium, contributions from several working group collaborators, and an introduction from Ragin and Riccò. Learn more.

The different disciplinary backgrounds allowed us to work toward an interdisciplinary understanding of issues surrounding militarization in the contemporary world. Indeed, as the working group progressed, we realized how important it was to focus on ensuring that our understanding and interpretation of militarization encompassed its myriad forms in the contemporary moment. Through these workshops we were able to identify what militarization looks like today, and where we encounter it.

—Renée Ragin and Giulia Riccò

Lowndes County Sanitation Access Network

Lowndes County

Graduate students Emily Meza (M.E.M.), Katy Hansen (Ph.D., Environmental Policy), and Ryan Juskus (Ph.D., Religion) sought to contribute to a community-based research partnership between the Duke Human Rights Center and the Alabama Center for Rural Enterprise (ACRE). The D-SIGN team included doctoral and professional students from the Divinity School, Law School, Nicholas School of the Environment, and Sanford School of Public Policy.

In collaboration with ACRE, the students focused on improving access to wastewater treatment in Lowndes County, Alabama, where up to 90% of households have either no or inadequate access to sanitation.

The D-SIGN project started with a site visit in July 2017. The students hosted community meetings to discuss the initial research and diagnosis the problem, and visited several homes without adequate access to sanitation.

Meza spent the year assessing likely predictors of seeing raw sewage on the ground, as well as broadly defining the scale and scope of the struggles with wastewater treatment faced by Lowndes County. Her analysis drew on an EPA-funded community survey conducted by ACRE and community volunteers in 2011-12. She presented her results to congressional staffers and industry representatives in Washington, D.C.

Hansen worked with six undergraduates to track the sources and distribution of federal and state funding for wastewater treatment infrastructure. This team is writing an article and policy brief about the distribution of federal funding for wastewater infrastructure in Alabama. Hansen and Danielle Purifoy presented this work at the American Associations of Geographers meeting in New Orleans.

For Juskus, participating in the project enhanced his dissertation research by improving his understanding of how race and history intersect with environmental concerns in Alabama. He mentored a graduate student in Theology and Environmental Management, and together they are proposing a panel on Lowndes County at Baylor University’s Symposium on Faith & Culture. Juskus is part of a follow-on D-SIGN grant for 2018-19 along with Katherine Pringle and Emma Lietz Bilecky. Learn more.

The wastewater issue is more than technical and political in nature. It is also a deeply human story. I learned that the water problem is also a soil problem; the septic technology approved by the health department doesn’t work largely because of the soil structure of the “Black Belt” region of Alabama. Even more, it was the black, fertile soil of the Black Belt that proved so attractive to the cotton planters who drove demand for the domestic slave trade from the Upper South to the Black Belt. This is a story of soil, souls, and society. Since last summer, I deepened initial connections between the wastewater issue, the Equal Justice Initiative, and theology.

—Ryan Juskus

Modeling Health & Environment Graduate Working Group

Modeling Health & Environment Graduate Working Group

For students exploring policy research, skills in systems thinking and computer modeling can be a valuable asset. However, many modeling tools are only accessible to those with advanced mathematical backgrounds.

The Modeling Health & Environment Graduate Working Group, organized by Shashika Bandara (M.Sc. in Global Health) and Varun Mallampalli (Ph.D. in Civil and Environmental Engineering), provided an opportunity for Duke students from multiple disciplines to learn about system dynamics modeling and build complex models relevant to their research.

Bandara and Mallampalli provided basic training on STELLA software, which they selected because it is suitable for use by students who don’t have the advanced math background required by many modeling software programs.

One working group session centered on an interactive exercise where students collaborated on a model to ward off a hypothetical flu epidemic. Participants responded positively (e.g., “I would take a course on this” and “This was very useful.”) Several sessions featured guest lecturers from Duke to outline the practical aspects of policymaking and modeling. The final session was a webinar with Georgia Mavrommati, Assistant Professor of Ecological Economics at the University of Massachusetts, Boston.

Based on the feedback from the working group and requests from undergraduate students, Bandara and Mallampalli decided to create an online resource with instructional videos, guest lectures, and other resource materials. Learn more.

As a global health master’s student, it was a great opportunity to consider how I can use modeling as a powerful policy advocacy tool. As a group, we benefited not only by the technical modeling-related knowledge sharing but also by the advice given by guest lecturers on communication, research, and careers. It was rewarding that even students outside the working group expressed interest in learning modeling due to the guest lectures. This is why we hope to make the learning tools available online for all students.

—Shashika Bandara

Network to Enrich GALS Summer Science Program

Network to Enrich GALS Summer Science Program

Doctoral students Jacqueline Gerson (Ecology) and Emily Levy (Biology) wanted to increase hands-on science opportunities for young women and other groups that are underrepresented in science, technology, engineering, and math. With fellow Duke students Emily Ury and Alice Carter, they created a free summer program called GALS (Girls on outdoor Adventure for Leadership & Science). High school students who identify as female or gender nonconforming, students of color, and students from low socioeconomic backgrounds are welcome to participate.

For the inaugural program in 2017, the founders created a science curriculum and taught eight young women about the scientific method, environmental science, and backpacking. While it was a success, they identified two areas that would strengthen the program: a standardized curriculum, and a humanities component to complement the environmental science focus.

To further this work, Gerson and Levy established a network to enrich the GALS program and received a D-SIGN grant. They worked with a master’s student in Teaching and Environmental Management, Katrina Herrera, to overhaul the curriculum. The lessons are now matched to state and national educational standards, and they include more hands-on and place-based learning activities.

Gerson and Levy held four network meetings with graduate students and postdocs from the Sanford School of Public Policy, Medical Physics Graduate Program, Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Economics, University Program in Ecology, Nicholas School of the Environment, and Biology. Through these meetings, they created four new lessons and documents that will enhance the GALS curriculum, as well as an instructor guide for sensitive science topics. They also used the grant to attend diversity trainings, purchase educational materials, and organize a backpacking training weekend for instructors. Learn more.

I can’t stress enough how beneficial the D-SIGN-supported network has been to this program. I am especially thankful for the time and effort of colleagues outside of the fields of biology and ecology who added a new level of thoughtfulness, intentionality, and depth to our curriculum. The connections we made will continue to strengthen our program and help us accomplish the GALS mission.

—Emily Levy

Looking Ahead

A January 2018 RFP invited all current Duke graduate students to propose interdisciplinary groups and activities for 2018-2019. We received ten proposals for the third D-SIGN cohort. Proposals were reviewed by a panel of faculty and graduate students from across the university.

Six graduate student groups received D-SIGN grants for use in 2018-2019. The 24 student organizers (nine women and 15 men) came from Arts & Sciences, Divinity School, Nicholas School of the Environment, Pratt School of Engineering, and Sanford School of Public Policy. Twenty are doctoral students; four are master’s students. The average award was $9,210. Student organizers will report on their activities by June 30, 2019.

Group Purpose Student Organizers Faculty Sponsor(s)
Duke-ACRE Partnership Address wastewater treatment in Lowndes County; evaluate strategies to address the problem and creatively represent the human face of the issue Katherine Pringle, M.A. in Economics; Ryan Juskus, Ph.D. in Religion; Emma Lietz Bilecky, M.E.M. Erika Weinthal
Fostering Community Participation in the Arts Promote equal role between creator and community member; present four performative works to Duke and Durham communities James Budinich and Brooks Frederickson, Ph.D. in Music Composition; Rebecca Uliasz, Ph.D. in Computational Media, Arts, and Cultures Scott Lindroth, Bill Seaman
Riding the Belt and Road Ignite discussion among students and faculty members on multiple facets of China’s new Belt Road Initiative, with a focus on environmental impacts Yating Li and Seth Morgan, Ph.D. in Environmental Policy; Travis Dauwalter, Ph.D. in Public Policy; Zainab Qazi and Santiago Sinclair Lecaros, M.E.M. Billy Pizer, Elizabeth Losos, Indermit Gill, Kathinka Fürst
Social Science Methods Network Create an environment in which graduate students working on social scientific projects can engage in methodological debates and collaboration as they work on turning research findings into publishable outputs Valerie-Jean Soon and Kobi Finestone, Ph.D. in Philosophy; Peng, Ph.D. in Political Science Kevin Hoover, Timur Kuran
Theology, Religion, and Qualitative Methods Network Employ methodological tools from the social sciences to better understand how cultural groups talk about holy figures and navigate ritual engagement with the sacred Michael Grigoni, Emily Dubie, and Ryan Juskus, Ph.D. in Religion; Dustin Benac and Sarah Jobe, Th.D. Luke Bretherton
Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Interdisciplinary Network of Graduate Students (WaSHINGS) Establish a platform allowing engineers, policy makers, educators, and entrepreneurs to share their perspectives and collaborate on strategies to improve water sanitation Lucas Rocha Melogno, Stewart Farling, Siddharth Kawadiya and Billy Gerhard, Ph.D. in Civil and Environmental Engineering; James Thostenson, Ph.D. in Electrical and Computer Engineering Marc Deshusses

Learn More

The next RFP will be released in early 2019. Any current Duke graduate student may submit a proposal for interdisciplinary projects, trainings, or experiences during the 2019-2020 academic year. If you have any questions, please contact the Office of the Vice Provost for Interdisciplinary Studies (216 Allen Building, 919-684-1964, interdisciplinary@duke.edu).

Duke Students Investigate Barriers to Sanitation Access in Lowndes County, Alabama

The D-SIGN team with faculty and community partners in Alabama

Duke University graduate students Emily Meza (M.E.M.), Katy Hansen (Ph.D., Environmental Policy), and Ryan Juskus (Ph.D., Religion) sought to contribute to a Emily Meza, Katy Hansen, and Ryan Juskuscommunity-based research partnership between the Duke Human Rights Center and the Alabama Center for Rural Enterprise to improve wastewater treatment in Lowndes County, Alabama.

Guided by their faculty sponsors Erika Weinthal and Elizabeth Albright, they received a Duke Support for Interdisciplinary Graduate Networks (D-SIGN) grant for 2017-2018. Here are excerpts from their year-end report.


The latest American Community Survey found that 630,000 U.S. households do not have a toilet or running water. Addressing the complex challenges undergirding lack of access—from limited technology to lack of funding and institutional shortcomings—require interdisciplinary efforts.

In close collaboration with the Alabama Center for Rural Enterprise (ACRE), our D-SIGN team, comprised of doctoral and professional students from the Duke Divinity School, Law School, Nicholas School of the Environment, and Sanford School of Public Policy, focused on improving access to wastewater treatment in Lowndes County, Alabama, where up to 90% of households have either no or inadequate access to sanitation.

The project started with a site visit in July 2017. We hosted community meetings in Lowndes County to discuss the initial research and diagnosis the problem, and visited several homes without adequate access to sanitation. We decided to focus on the interlaced physical and financial barriers to sanitation access

Household Sanitation Conditions

Team looking at the lagoon near Hayneville

Emily Meza spent the year assessing likely predictors of seeing raw sewage on the ground, as well as broadly defining the scale and scope of the struggles with wastewater treatment faced by Lowndes County. Her analysis relies on an EPA-funded community survey conducted by ACRE and community volunteers in 2011-2012.

Approximately 2,450 households (~56% of households county-wide) were interviewed in person about sanitation conditions in their home and on their property. Four main types of wastewater disposal methods were identified—full sewer connection, settling tank connected to sewer, septic systems, and straight pipes (lack of any treatment). While 92% of the county reported being served by a municipal drinking water utility, only 21.8% were served by a sewer system. As expected, residents that used straight pipes to dispose of their wastewater were ~36 times more likely than residents connected to a full sewer to report raw sewage on the ground. Additionally, those whose septic or settling tanks were not operating properly were ~35 times more likely to see raw sewage. Improving sanitation and reducing exposure to raw sewage in Lowndes County requires addressing both private household needs as well as the municipal utilities with failing infrastructure.

Emily presented her results with the ACRE team to congressional staffers and industry representatives in Washington, D.C. in March 2018.

Kelsey Rowland, Carly Osborne, and Emily Meza at the stakeholder meeting in Washington

It was very encouraging to be in a room with thirty-plus people all working on similar issues. We heard from scholars at Baylor, Columbia, and Michigan State, as well as the nonprofit and private sector stakeholders. While my research focused on Lowndes County, hearing from so many viewpoints impressed how widespread sanitation issues are in both the US and worldwide. Multiple congressional staffers also attended the full day workshop, and a month later Senator Cory Booker introduced a bipartisan bill to the Senate to address these issues. While Catherine had been working with Senator Booker for a while, our stakeholder meeting helped get a critical mass of interest around the problems. Having played an active role in that was significant and encouraging experience, even if there remains much work ahead.

—Emily Meza, second-year Master of Environmental Management student

Funding for Wastewater Treatment Infrastructure

Katy Hansen and Danielle Purifoy at the AAG

Katy Hansen worked closely with Bryce Cracknell (Trinity ’18) and five other undergraduates to track the sources and distribution of federal and state funding for wastewater treatment infrastructure. This team collected information on funding from agencies’ websites, compiled and cleaned the data, and are in the process of writing an article and policy brief about the distribution of federal funding for wastewater infrastructure in Alabama.

This work will help determine whether the percentage of nonwhite or low-income residents influences the likelihood of applying for and receiving financial assistance. Eligibility criteria, application and recipient requirements, and insufficient funding act as barriers to low-resource communities seeking funding. Katy presented this work with Danielle Purifoy at the American Associations of Geographers meeting in New Orleans in April 2018.

Individuals’ Relationship to Nature

Ryan Juskus researches how people conceptualize and act on their relation to nature in contexts where social marginalization, religion, and fossil fuels are key factors. Participating in the project helped Ryan with his dissertation research on north Birmingham by improving his understanding of how race and history intersect with environmental concerns in Alabama.

His trips to Lowndes County helped him make connections between the Lowndes work and Equal Justice Initiative’s (EJI) effort to re-narrate the racial history of the region from slavery to mass incarceration. ACRE’s work dovetails well with and fleshes out EJI’s work by adding the environmental side of the story. Ryan has tried to highlight the humanities aspects of the Duke-ACRE partnership by pointing to the ways that the wastewater issue is more than technical and political in nature. It is also a deeply human story. Ryan hopes to add ethics and religion analyses to interdisciplinary research projects in environmental justice.

As a humanities scholar on a project driven by social sciences and focused primarily on technical and political solutions to the wastewater challenges in Lowndes County, I joined the team without a clear sense of what I would be able to contribute. During a visit to Lowndes County with the D-SIGN team last summer, however, I learned that the water problem is also a soil problem; the septic technology approved by the health department doesn’t work largely because of the soil structure of the “Black Belt” region of Alabama. Even more, it was the black, fertile soil of the Black Belt that proved so attractive to the cotton planters who drove demand for the domestic slave trade from the Upper South to the Black Belt.

I also learned that the famous Selma to Montgomery marchers crossed through and slept in Lowndes County, and that Stokely Carmichael first articulated the turn to black power on Lowndes soil. I then visited the Equal Justice Initiative in Montgomery and learned about their project to collect soil from historic lynching sites as part of their community memory initiative to renarrate the history of racial hierarchy in the U.S. from slavery to mass incarceration. EJI invokes hundreds of jars of soil as a witness to the era of racial terrorism and to our current responsibility to understand and combat this legacy of violence-enforced hierarchy.

As a student of Christian political theology, I immediately thought of Yahweh’s words to Cain after he killed his brother Abel, “The voice of your brother’s blood is crying to me from the ground.” When words fail, the soil can speak. But who is listening?

In short, I discovered that my role on the team was to tell these more than technical and political aspects of the project. This is a story of soil, souls, and society. Since last summer, I deepened these initial connections between the wastewater issue, EJI, and theology. I also mentored a graduate student in theology and environmental management on these themes. Together, we are proposing a panel on Lowndes County at Baylor University’s Symposium on Faith & Culture this fall.

—Ryan Juskus, third-year Ph.D. student in Religion

Peace and Justice Summit

Lastly, the team attended the opening of EJI’s lynching memorial and the Peace and Justice Summit in Montgomery, Alabama in April 2018. Both the memorial and summit were profoundly moving experiences, sober, informative, and motivating all at once.

National Memorial for Peace and Justice

Our work would not have been possible without the generous support of The Graduate School and the four-year partnership between the Duke Human Rights Center at the Franklin Humanities Institute (FHI) and the Alabama Center for Rural Enterprise. We thank Ms. Catherine Coleman Flowers (ACRE), Dr. Erika Weinthal (NSOE & FHI), Dr. Elizabeth Albright (NSOE), Dr. Megan Mullin (NSOE), and Emily Stewart (FHI) for their commitment, effort, and expertise.

About D-SIGN

This internal funding mechanism from the Office of the Vice Provost for Interdisciplinary Studies encourages graduate students to explore beyond disciplinary lines, both in research and coursework. The goal is to enable graduate students to build or extend their networks and to integrate collaborative, cross-school experiences into their programs, thereby increasing the number of individuals whose graduate training reflects Duke’s commitment to interdisciplinarity and knowledge in the service of society.

  • See who else received D-SIGN grants in 2017-2018.

 

Photos: The D-SIGN team with faculty and community partners in Alabama; Emily Meza, Katy Hansen, and Ryan Juskus; the team looking at the lagoon near Hayneville; Kelsey Rowland, Carly Osborne, and Emily Meza at the stakeholder meeting in Washington, D.C.; Katy Hansen and Danielle Purifoy at the AAG; National Memorial for Peace and Justice