Author: Rosanne Lam

The Role of the COP in Climate Action

As I write my final blog post on COP24 in a café in Kraków, I am stunned by the amount of both direct and indirect information I’ve learned in just five days of attending COP24 in Katowice. The Conference of the Parties, COP, is a fascinating combination of international political negotiations on mobilization of climate action, a showcase of culture, and theatrical performance.

The main purpose of the COP is the negotiations themselves, and what most people think of when they think of these UN Climate Change conferences. This year’s COP was arguably the most important COP since Paris three years ago. After speaking to many delegates, I have gathered that movement within the international negotiations is not only slow, but seems to be slowing down further. The call for climate action has been consistently ringing, and while everyone agrees the call needs to be picked up, no one has. While it is in everyone’s interest to divest from coal and transition to more renewable sources of fuel and energy, developing countries less affected by climate change are unwilling to reduce coal consumption. While developed countries like Sweden are able to sing their songs of success, developing countries argue they should be allowed the room and freedom to develop (read: emit). To complicate the situation further, least developed countries have already begun to observe the detrimental effects of climate change: higher intensity and frequency of natural disasters, and extreme climate conditions. Of course, a mention of the negotiations must include the developed countries unwilling to go cold turkey on their coal and fossil fuel problem, like Australia, the US, and Saudi Arabia.

Katowice Sign by the Christmas Market

The COP presidency is also a critical part of the conference, setting the tone and acts as an inspirational figure calling for climate action. This year’s COP president, Michał Kurtya, placed emphasis on a Just Transition (to ensure the transition away from coal doesn’t displace workers), and Intergenerational Equity. These two themes permeated throughout the COP this year, Just Transition making more of an appearance formally in parties’ documents and speeches, while Intergenerational Equity was more indirectly emphasized through children presenting and speaking at the COP. While this was the case, during the UN’s Secretary General António Gueterres’ Meeting with Observer Organizations, YOUNGO (youth constituency) noted they felt their voices unheard. While COP24 echoed the need for increased ambition in climate action, and called for the parties to be as ambitious as possible, Poland has won not only Fossil of the Day, but also Colossal Fossil (aka. Fossil of the Year). As I reflect on week 2 of the COP, I can’t help but wonder how parties may have been dissuaded from ambition and finalizing a comprehensive Paris Rulebook because they didn’t observe sufficient ambition from Poland, the host country of this year’s COP. To further grey Poland’s position on climate action, the Poland Pavilion featured daily samples of venison jerky, coal jewelry, and quite frequently coal workers in traditional uniform handing out pro-coal candy.

Ms Patricia Espinosa, Executive Secretary of UN Climate Change

While that is all occurring at the COP, subnational (aka. non-party stakeholders) actors such as cities, regions, businesses, and NGOs, host a plethora of side events. I believe that beyond the formal negotiations, much of the value-add to the necessity of an annual COP is to inspire through a grand showcasing of climate action, an exchange of cultures, but most importantly the exchange of ideas through conversation. In the short five days I was in attendance at COP24 this year, I had the opportunity to talk to delegates from France, Dominican Republic, United States, and Angola, industry individuals who like myself are interested in increasing Public-Private Partnerships (PPP) from all around the world, and individuals from renowned environmental NGOs like the Nature Conservancy. Nowhere else in the world are you able to spark up conversation with someone waiting in line for coffee and find out they work for an organization you’ve only read about and dreamt of working for. Nowhere else in the world will you find so many climate leaders and advocates in the same space, sharing ideas, and working towards tangible climate action.

I am filled with eagerness to act and increase climate action, while the COP was inspiring, it is the translation of everything discussed at the conference to action at home that is most important. Thank you to COP24, Patricia Espinosa, and António Gueterres. Thank you to Michał Kurtya and the city of Katowice for your warm welcome. Thank you to Galen Hiltbrand, Tasfia Nayem, Jonathan Weiner, and Billy Pizer for a great semester, and making my dreams of attending a COP a reality. Let’s get to work.

Reflections on Talanoa, Smart Cities, and the Underlying Politics

During the entirety of week 2 at the COP, I started off my day by attending the BINGO constituency (Business and Industry Non-Governmental Organizations) meeting. These meetings were a great way to nail down the side events of interest happening that day. At the COP, because it is such a large conference with representatives from around the world, the sheer number of events can be overwhelming to navigate. A strategy I’ve learned is to make a rough outline (emphasis on rough since so many side events are not announced on the Daily Programme, so leaving flexibility to change your plan for the day is also important) the night prior, though these programmes aren’t released until late.

On the second day of week 2, I mainly attended negotiations with a cities event in between. That morning I successfully scored a ticket to the Second-Half of the High-Level Segment at the BINGO meeting! My day started by attending the Talanoa Dialogue (find my post on the closing session of this year’s Ministerial Talanoa here), created at COP23 (Conference of Parties #23, hosted last year in Bonn, Germany, by Fiji) was a wonderful addition to the annual UN climate change conference as it created a separate space for inclusive dialogue. Talanoa in Fijian means “a process of inclusive, participatory, and transparent dialogue”, which I truly believe in as a great way to increase the degree of trust between parties. Trust is an essential part of the enactment of the Paris Agreement because under Nationally-Determined Contributions (NDCs), countries make their own commitments to climate action. Trust is essential to avoid a global collective action problem, and essential to this year’s negotiations.

It was a combination of my interest in renewable energy, my love of vertical, dense cities coupled with the need for systemic change in city-planning practices (particularly transportation, and buildings) that drove me to attend the Smart Cities event. At the event, four esteemed panellists (representatives from Volkswagen, Robert Bosch GmbH, thyssenkrupp AG, and ICLEI) discussed the future of cities; what they believed is needed to minimize carbon emissions of future growth, and manage existing city infrastructure. ICLEI is one of my favourite organisations because of their work in the Public-Private Partnership (PPP) space, and their leveraging of multilateral linkages and connections to catalyse sub-national sustainable urban development. The panellists echoed the key barriers of smart cities: the high capital costs of infrastructural change, and difficulty in transforming existing (read: less efficient) buildings.

The highlight of my day (yet again) was having the honour of listening to Patricia Espinosa, Executive Secretary of the UNFCCC, speak at after the COP24 President, Michał Kurtyka, introduced the Second-Half of the High-Level Segment. After the formal introduction, ministers and prime ministers of all parties went up one by one to give their national statements. With only three official days of COP24 left, the pressure to complete the Rulebook is on. While most parties recognized the urgency and necessity of the finalisation of the Paris Rulebook, some countries refused to “welcome” the IPCC Special Report on 1.5oC (not trying to point fingers, but they were the US, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and Russia). As a matter of fact, the US event went as far as to host an official side event on “green coal” and “sustainable fossil fuels”. Working for the BCSE was particularly interesting as they are very much entangled and in tune with the US delegation at the COP, navigating the politics at play in the US and at the COP, while their members (BCSE has 50+ members, comprised of companies in the renewable energy sector) ‘watched’ from reading the BCSE’s daily updates.

 

Preparation for Week 2 at COP24

All week I’ve keenly followed week 1 of COP24 through reading my fellow colleagues’ daily updates at the COP, watching both the live stream and on-demand recordings, reading as many tweets from the negotiations as possible, and reading newsletter coverage of the negotiations. Katowice, historically known for its coal mining and industry, was chosen as the destination for this year’s COP to change the narrative and signify the necessary shift away from fossil fuels, specifically coal.

“…and why should I be studying for a future that soon may be no more?” -Greta Thunberg

Before even departing for Poland, keeping up with the COP24 has me awestruck. Celebrity activists such as David Attenborough and Arnold Schwarzenegger called for increased climate action and ambition. A speech given by COP24 superstar Greta Thunberg (age 15, pictured on the right) was particularly special. Greta Thunberg is a climate activist who sat on the steps of the Swedish Parliament demanding for more climate action and divestment from fossil fuels leading up to the Swedish election. She called for a systemic change, regardless of politics, in order to secure a future for generations to come and warned that we are running out of time. Greta gave her speech next to not only the Executive Secretary of the UNFCCC, Christiana Figueres, but also the Secretary General of the UN, António Guterres (both pictured above).

China takes up the largest proportion of global carbon emissions, followed by USA, EU28, and India

At the Pre-2020 Global Stocktake Technical Part, I was (unfortunately) not surprised when Saudi Arabia called for the deletion of the term “ambition mechanism” in the Global Stocktake text despite the urgent need for increased climate ambition called for by both the Paris Agreement and the IPCC 1.5˚C Special Report. The news of insufficient climate action continued with the release of a report by the Global Carbon Project, such that this Global Carbon Budget 2018 data can serve as a “balance sheet” in the future.

On the sub-national side, I attended a webinar hosted by the Center for Climate and Energy Solutions (C2ES) on “Energy Efficient Cities: Lessons from Public-Private Initiatives” where Duke Energy highlighted a particularly interesting Public-Private Partnership (PPP) initiative with the city of Charlotte, NC, on a community-based project for increasing smart technology access to increase energy efficiency savings. Another top US utilities company, Xcel, has committed to going 100% carbon-free by 2050, 80% carbon free by 2030, a huge ambitious commitment. I hope more companies, cities, and parties will make commitments to reduce their carbon emissions during the rest of COP24, and transparently report their progress towards these goals.

At all levels, there is buzz on the COP and future of climate change. As I pack for my flight to Katowice tomorrow morning, I am filled with cautious optimism that the parties will reach an agreement on the Paris Rulebook. At COP24, I will be working for the Business Council for Sustainable Energy (BCSE) and following transparency, sub-national action, advancement of the SDGs, and the Talanoa Dialogue.

© 2024 Duke to the UNFCCC

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑