Stare Decisis for Originalist Judges

Sometimes the original meaning of the Constitution conflicts with or points in a different direction from the Supreme Court’s precedents.  When that happens, what is the role of stare decisis?  What should an originalist Court do with non-originalist precedent?

Join us for a discussion on the role of stare decisis for originalist judges with Professor Randy Barnett, moderated by Professor Ernest Young.  Professor Barnett is the Patrick Hotung Professor of Constitutional Law, Carmack Waterhouse Professor of Legal Theory at the Georgetown University Law Center, and Director of the Georgetown Center for the Constitution.  You can find his most recent writing on the topic here (https://lawliberty.org/forum/stare-decisis-for-originalist-judges/).

Sponsored by the Duke Law Federalist Society.  For more information, please contact Meredith Criner at meredith.criner@duke.edu.

Log in using Webinar ID: 957 3810 4543, or this link: https://zoom.us/j/95738104543.

I Can’t Believe We Need To Label Butter! The First Amendment and Special Interests In The Food Industry

Wen Fa, an attorney at the Pacific Legal Foundation, along with Duke Law professors Nicole Ligon and Sarah Ludington, will discuss the interaction of the First Amendment and commercial speech in the food industry.  Mr. Fa will focus his discussion on a Wisconsin butter regulations case he litigated, along with GMO regulations and compelled subsidies for advertisements.

Sponsored by the Duke Law Federalist Society.  Co-sponsored by the Duke Food Law Society (@duke_fls) and the Duke Law First Amendment Clinic.  For more information, please contact Brendan Clemente at brendan.clemente@duke.edu.

Log in using Webinar ID: 993 0614 0493, or this link: https://zoom.us/j/99306140493

Free To Move: Foot Voting, Migration, & Political Freedom

Join us for a discussion with Professor Ilya Somin led by Professor Guy-Uriel Charles on Professor Somin’s most recent book, Free to Move: Foot Voting, Migration, and Political Freedom. In Free to Move, Professor Somin explains how foot voting, making decisions about whether to immigrate, where to live within a federal system, and what to purchase or support in the private sector, can greatly enhance political liberty for millions of people around the world.

Sponsored by the Duke Law Federalist Society. Co-sponsored by the Duke Political Science Department (@dukepolisci), the Duke Program in American Values and Institutions, and the Duke FOCUS Program. For more information, please contact Meredith Criner at meredith.criner@duke.edu.

Login in using Webinar ID: 977 3799 6756, or this link: https://zoom.us/j/97737996756

Uber Everything? The Sharing Economy and the Regulatory State

Will there come a day when we use Uber to deliver or rent nearly everything we use?  And how do regulations impact the increasing scope of sharing services in our economy?  This event features two experts on the sharing economy discussing how sharing services will expand and how the regulatory state will impact that expansion.

Michael Munger, an Economics Professor at Duke and the author of Tomorrow 3.0: Transaction Costs and the Sharing Economy, will provide the economic context for the emergence of sharing services like Uber and Airbnb.  Jon Riches, the Director of Litigation at the Goldwater Institute, will discuss how the regulatory state impacts the growth of sharing services.  Duke Law Professor Matthew Adler will moderate discussion and Q&A.

Sponsored by the Duke Law Federalist Society. Co-sponsored by the American Constitution Society (@dukelawacs), the Duke Political Science Department (@dukepolisci), the Duke Program in Law and Entrepreneurship, the Duke Law Center for Innovation Policy, the Duke Law and Economics Society, the Duke Center for Science & Technology Policy, the Duke Initiative on Science & Society (@dukescisoc) and the Duke Fuqua Center for Entrepreneurship & Innovation (@fuqua_cei). For more information, please contact Brendan Clemente at brendan.clemente@duke.edu.

Log in using Webinar ID: 965 7859 3905, or this link: https://zoom.us/j/96578593905

Was Erie Correctly Decided?

The ultimate smackdown: Professor Sachs versus Professor Young in “Was Erie Correctly Decided?” Join us for a debate between Professor Sachs and Professor Young moderated by Professor Levy on the age-old question: does federal common law exist and did the Supreme Court make the correct decision in Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins? Sponsored by the Duke Law Federalist Society.

For more information, please contact Meredith Criner at meredith.criner@duke.edu

Log in with this Webinar ID: 925 6431 8333, or this link: https://zoom.us/j/92564318333

Unqualified Immunity? The Challenges of Holding Federal Officials Accountable

Anya Bidwell, Elfie Gallun Fellow in Freedom and the Constitution and attorney at the Institute for Justice, will explain why it is so difficult to hold federal officials accountable for misconduct.  She will discuss Bivens doctrine, qualified immunity, and how joint state and federal task forces allow local officials to gain the same immunities as federal officials.  This will include discussion of Brownback v. King, a case she is working on which will come before the Supreme Court this November.

Professor Brandon Garrett, Faculty Director of the Wilson Center for Science and Justice, will moderate a discussion following Ms. Bidwell’s remarks.
The panel will feature UCLA Law Professor Joanna Schwartz, a leading expert on qualified immunity, and University of Texas Law Professor Steve Vladeck, a leading expert on federal courts and constitutional law.

Sponsored by the Duke Law Federalist Society.  Co-sponsored by the Criminal Law Society, the Center for Criminal Justice and Professional Responsibility, the Innocence Project, and the Wilson Center for Science and Justice.  For more information, please contact Brendan Clemente at brendan.clemente@duke.edu.

Log in with this Webinar ID: 993 5469 1485, or this link: https://zoom.us/j/99354691485

Judicial Engagement vs. Judicial Restraint

Join us for a debate on judicial engagement versus judicial restraint.

Director of the Institute for Justice’s Center for Judicial Engagement, Anthony Sanders, will discuss the theory of judicial engagement, while George Mason University’s Antonin Scalia Law Assistant Professor and Director of the C. Boyden Gray Center for the Study of the Administrative State, Adam White, will discuss the theory of judicial restraint. Duke Law Professor Ernest Young will moderate and provide commentary.

Sponsored by the Duke Law Federalist Society.  For more information, please contact Meredith Criner at meredith.criner@duke.edu.

Webinar ID:959 3636 5421