Although I like the idea of mapping social movements, protests, and organization as a means of activism itself, I remain skeptical on the effectiveness of the tool.
I realize that there are compelling arguments supporting the use of maps, such as for a clear visualization of connections and patterns, or as a storytelling medium. Maps are particularly adept at these abilities since are in a gray zone between facts and fiction; they are often perceived as facts, although they can often include mistakes or lies. For instance, Sebastian Münster’s map of the “New World” in 1540 looks nothing like modern maps, but it was accepted as true at the time. Even today we take it for granted that our maps are accurate, even though the scale and area of countries are off.
Sebastian Münster’s Map of the “New World”. Link: https://i.pinimg.com/originals/95/d3/f2/95d3f28651694e96e07b1d2cb4c27cbf.jpg
However, although the notion that maps are statements and facts can be used to tell powerful stories or draw striking connections as we saw this past week, I believe that they can be exploited as well. As we mentioned in class, no maps are biased. Where we might analyze data tied to locations and map the results, opposers may dismiss it as invalid or even create a counterargument through a map.
Furthermore, I feel that there are more effective alternatives when it comes to sparking a social movement or change, in particular social media. We have seen countless of movements, protests, and marches stem from online activity, such as the Arab Spring, #MeToo, or even this weekend’s March for Our Lives.
All in all, I agree that we have do voice our opinions in today’s society, especially when it comes to environmental issues. I just don’t know if mapping social movements is the best way to do so.
