Assessment design in the age of AI

Go through the following papers/resources:

  1. The following sections from the handbook Chapter 14 Assessment and Plagiarism
    1. Focus: General CER terms and frameworks around assessment with a focus on contract cheating, which in some ways is the pre-2022 equivalent to AI.
    2. 14.1.2 Assessment and Student Learning Outcomes
      1. 14.1.2.1 Context
      2. 14.1.2.2 Assessment and Learning Outcomes
      3. 14.1.2.3 The Assessment of Programming
      4. 14.1.3.4 Contract Cheating
    3. 14.2.2.2 Detecting Contract Cheating
    4. 14.2.3 Assessment Design for Plagiarism Prevention
      1. 14.2.3.1 General Principles

      2. 14.2.3.2 Multiple Activities

  2. [Listen to the podcast or read the article] A Continuum for Using AI in Schools by The Creative Classroom with John Spencer
    1. Focus: Learning about the framework and spectrum the podcaster discusses.
  3. If you didn’t do this one from the “AI and CER” day at least watch the video: Chris Kerslake, Paul Denny, David H. Smith, James Prather, Juho Leinonen, Andrew Luxton-Reilly, and Stephen MacNeil. 2024. Integrating Natural Language Prompting Tasks in Introductory Programming Courses. In Proceedings of the 2024 on ACM Virtual Global Computing Education Conference V. 1 (SIGCSE Virtual 2024). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 88–94. https://doi.org/10.1145/3649165.3690125
    1. Video from the authors
    2. Focus: Learning about the two kinds of activities the students did to see how some are starting to use AI as part of assessment.

Add 1 entry for #1 and #2 above to your QQC Doc.

If you are wondering how much to write, check out the QQC Doc Check-in post.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *