A Foreigner in Morocco – Alex Frumkin

Aerial view of Fes, Morocco. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fes_(5364182941).jpg

 

Aerial view of Rabat. https://www.airpano.com/360Degree-VirtualTour.php?3D=Rabat-Morocco

 

Disregarding the one Moroccan who claimed he was surprised that I wasn’t Moroccan and even said that “[I] look Moroccan,” I’m confident that everyone in Morocco sees me as a foreigner – someone who is simply not native to Morocco, no xenophobic implications attached (interestingly I think I’m frequently assumed to be European first; while I don’t have a “reason” why, my guess is that it’s largely based on an availability heuristic because Morocco has far more tourism from Europe than from the US).

 

No matter where you are in the world, you’re treated differently dependent on how you’re perceived by the population; it’s simply human nature for us to perceive distinctions between other human beings, and these distinctions often lead to variation in human interactions.  Perception of foreignness, or rather the perceived degree of human separation between yourself and someone else, is perhaps the single most important factor that contributes to distinctions in human interactions. Though I’ve only been in Rabat for a week, I can already tell that the city has a weaker perception of foreignness than Fes, and this results in a big difference between my human experience in these two cities.

 

In Fes, even as tourism continues to grow, foreigners are anomalies. Ville Nouvelle (the French section of a Moroccan city, specifically the one from Fes in this case), despite being built by the French to accommodate its own nationals in Fes, still feels like a place where foreigners really aren’t meant to be. And this lack of belonging is much stronger in the old medina (Fes el Bali). A way of life that has been sustained for 1,000+ years is by no means accommodating to people for whom the city was never built. Meanwhile, Rabat’s history is rooted in European involvement in Morocco, so Rabat is by nature far more experienced with white people whom are less perceived as foreign in this city. Rabat actually has a pretty old history itself, created by the Almohad Caliphate during the 1100s, but because the city was so much smaller than Fes, it would eventually be defined by its European intervention – unlike Fes where it’s hardly part of the city’s identity. Fes was actually originally intended to be the capital of the French protectorate (as it was the capital for most of Morocco’s history and the current capital at the time of invasion), but because of the city’s strong sense of history and its resentment of the invading European powers, Rabat was chosen instead – the weather was better there, too. Fes held its ground, but Rabat became a byproduct of France and lost much of its strictly Moroccan identity, paving the way for Europeans and other foreigners to feel far less “foreign” today.

 

As for how life is different based on the perception of foreignness, it mostly boils down to the principle of treating people better if you’re closer to them and more connected to them. Overall, Moroccans are very hospitable and friendly, largely as a result of their collective identity. Foreigners will be able to get a sense of that, but they will never have the same benefits and social capital as Moroccans do when visiting the country. The difference in this treatment is fairly subtle and difficult to elaborate on, but the best example of this phenomenon would be business transactions, specifically taxis and shopping in the souks of the old medina. Regarding taxis, drivers in Fes are very eager to try and make several extra draham (plural of dirham, the currency of Morocco, with one worth approximately $0.11) by charging an upfront fee higher than what taxi users are supposed to be charged based on the distance driven. For example, a metered taxi from my home to my school should have been around 12 draham, but since it was slightly out of the way, drivers in my neighborhood would insist on my roommate and I paying 20 draham to go there or paying 10 draham to go somewhere else that was an 8-minute walk away from school. While the money isn’t much (it does add up over time), I was most bothered by the principle of having to pay a tax of sorts because I wasn’t from Morocco; the attempt to overcharge customers is not something limited to foreigners, but from what I’ve observed, foreigners are way more likely to be exposed to this reality. In regard to the souks of the old medina, whenever asking how expensive something is, it’s almost a guarantee that you’re being charged too much. This is true for foreigners and Moroccans alike, but foreigners are still charged more upfront. And no matter what, foreigners will never be able to achieve the “local price,” settling for what is most likely a good deal but still at least somewhat unfair. Rabat, on the other hand, seems to have a much weaker perception of foreignness within the business realm. I cannot speak from personal experience in this department because I live walking distance from my school now, so I have no need for taxis, and I haven’t had a chance to shop in the old medina yet. However, at least concerning taxis, I’ve heard every group member that’s taken taxis in both cities say that taxis are better in Rabat and that none of them have been scammed here. If there’s no “foreign tax” on taxi rides in Rabat, I think it’s safe to assume there is a smaller, if any, foreign tax when shopping in the souks of Rabat’s old city; other reasoning to support this hunch is that – once again – people in Rabat are much more accustomed to Europeans so they are less likely to perceive white people as foreign, and also, because the medina is more spread out than Fes el Bali, the souks are much smaller, and the medina is much more accessible to the European part of the city, the medina has a greater general sense of openness. Regardless of the reason for the difference in treatment, foreigners pay a smaller price for their foreignness than in Fes, but Moroccans themselves have to pay a greater price in the form of culture and identity as a result of its exposure to colonialism and capitalism.

 

With my understanding of Morocco, I came to believe that Rabat would have virtually no culture; while I was exaggerating, I have been pleasantly surprised with the culture intact regarding Rabat’s medina. But despite this, my general presumption has still shown to be largely correct: the medina of Rabat is smaller than that of Fes in terms of size, culture, population, and history. When France decided to make Rabat the new capital, there was simply less culture for the city to hold onto. Even though the medina was preserved, the Ville Nouvelle clearly became the most important part of the city because it has been home to essentially all of the city’s governmental operations and modern business enterprise within the past 100 years; prior to the creation of the French section of the city, the French census placed Rabat’s population at around 25,000 in 1912, while the whole city’s population is almost 600,000 people today. During the French protectorate, foreign nationals constituted around 30% of the city’s population; now, that number is much less since there are less than 100,000 foreign residents in all of Morocco. While colonialism has ended, the central force holding onto the Ville Nouvelle as the center of Rabat is arguably capitalism. When the French protectorate ended, the Alaouite dynasty decided that Rabat would remain the capital and the royal family, whose palace was in the European section of the city, would stay there. The family could have returned to the historical capital or any other city, but it stayed in Rabat; that suggests the royal family found French development appealing and/or desirable, and that development is inseparable from capitalism. As Mohamed VI continues to modernize both Rabat and even his own institution of monarchy, one thing remains clear: capitalism is the strongest force driving Morocco today, and the economic theory certainly isn’t foreign to Europeans or Americans. France may have been the initial cause for Rabat’s weaker perception of foreignness, but as the city modernizes – it eventually plans to complete the tallest skyscraper and largest opera house in Africa – and attempts to implement itself into both the Western and global world, foreigners will only become less foreign. Fes, too, will become more modern over time as tourism and industry increases, but because Rabat is the capital and center of the king’s plans, it will also be Morocco’s least foreign city for the indefinite future.

5 comments to A Foreigner in Morocco – Alex Frumkin

  • Fatih kamal

    It is a good idea to share your thoughts with others Alex. Equality prices is a big problem in Morocco because salespersons aren’t show their prices. My german friend had the same experience.
    Keep writing,
    Fatih

  • Eddy F.

    I am surprise how people’s assumptions, biases, and experience can describe how you can be one thing, ex. how that person thought you were moroccan. I like your view of capitalism in Morocco. It is interesting on how foreign taxes can be a good thing.

  • David Hume

    Great piece again, Alex.

    I think I wanted you to clarify what causal impact you thought colonialism and capitalism have had on Morocco.

    You wrote: “Regardless of the reason for the difference in treatment, foreigners pay a smaller price for their foreignness than in Fes, but Moroccans themselves have to pay a greater price in the form of culture and identity as a result of its exposure to colonialism and capitalism.”

    I felt it was a bit imprecise. Capitalism has increased the standard of living of billions of people, even if it does mean that rural Moroccans have a McDonald’s on their street corner. It would have been interesting to get an idea of how you balance both the costs and benefits of capitalism, and the same could be said of colonialism. I recall that, in one of your previous pieces, you interviewed a woman called Halima who lamented the Islamist strictures of modern day life in Morocco (at least for women). There are certainly countries where the cultural dilution caused by colonialism has moderated some of the illiberal aspects of the colonised culture. I would love to hear your thoughts about this.

    I would also love to know how you conceptualise the identity that you referenced. I think a lot of Westerners deride the concept of American or British national or cultural identity, but mourn the loss of a Moroccan identity. Do you feel this way too? If so, why the disparity? If not, what is the value of such identity? Does it have any?

    You must come visit me in Edinburgh some time!

    All the best,

    Dave

  • Sam C

    Interesting thoughts about the idea of foreignness! I’ve experienced some of the same things about the “local price” and how natives treat foreigners differently last summer in China. When vendors realized I wasn’t native (and in fact, I still looked the same, though my Mandarin was choppy), they viewed me much differently and were less willing to bargain. Fascinating and your post serves to shed light on the ingroup vs out-group mentality that is a result of natural, evolutionary tendencies.

  • Michael

    I wonder what constitutes the “foreigner” status which would lead to such price increases. Are the indicators primarily physical appearance? Accent? Speech pattern? I wonder if Moroccans are so unique that they could identify non-Morrocan Arabs.

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>