<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Connecting Canada and Texas</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sites.duke.edu/eujamie/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sites.duke.edu/eujamie</link>
	<description>Tar Sands Case Study</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 00:01:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Avoiding the Issue?</title>
		<link>http://sites.duke.edu/eujamie/2011/11/13/avoiding-the-issue/</link>
		<comments>http://sites.duke.edu/eujamie/2011/11/13/avoiding-the-issue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 00:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eugenie Dubin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sites.duke.edu/eujamie/?p=121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Because of the weight of the tar sands-pipeline issue, President Obama&#8217;s decision would significantly impact his chance for re-election and the alignment of the vote. That said, Obama sent the issue back to Congress, and decided to delay the vote on and official review of the pipeline until after the 2012 election. The new review [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because of the weight of the tar sands-pipeline issue, President Obama&#8217;s decision would significantly impact his chance for re-election and the alignment of the vote. That said, Obama sent the issue back to Congress, and decided to delay the vote on and official review of the pipeline until after the 2012 election. The new review is required to include a climate impact statement. (This is at the same time as there has been a move to re-route the pipeline.) Some say that this effectively kills the pipeline, while environmentalist Glenn Hurowitz says it is just a delay to catastrophe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sites.duke.edu/eujamie/2011/11/13/avoiding-the-issue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TransCanada&#8217;s Business</title>
		<link>http://sites.duke.edu/eujamie/2011/11/11/transcanadas-business/</link>
		<comments>http://sites.duke.edu/eujamie/2011/11/11/transcanadas-business/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 15:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eugenie Dubin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sites.duke.edu/eujamie/?p=118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TransCanada claims that it will take full responsibility for the contamination of water if there is a spill from the pipeline. This said, they claim they will supply &#8220;an alternative water supply.&#8221; I bring up this point because it is a grand claim to make for a company who, in truth, has made pipelines primarily [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TransCanada claims that it will take full responsibility for the contamination of water if there is a spill from the pipeline. This said, they claim they will supply &#8220;<a href="http://www.transcanada.com/protecting_environment.html">an alternative water supply</a>.&#8221; I bring up this point because it is a grand claim to make for a company who, in truth, has made pipelines primarily for natural gas. Looking at <a href="http://www.transcanada.com/docs/Investor_Centre/2010_TCC_AIF_Eng.pdf">TransCanada&#8217;s Annual Report (from FEBRUARY 2011)</a>, the Keystone Pipeline is the only oil pipeline in use. The company lists prospects for three other pipelines on its website, none of which have been completed but have recieved &#8220;firm commitments.&#8221; Needless to say, the company is inexperienced in this field.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sites.duke.edu/eujamie/2011/11/11/transcanadas-business/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is the damage already done?</title>
		<link>http://sites.duke.edu/eujamie/2011/11/11/is-the-damage-already-done/</link>
		<comments>http://sites.duke.edu/eujamie/2011/11/11/is-the-damage-already-done/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 15:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eugenie Dubin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sites.duke.edu/eujamie/?p=115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160; This is the map of all of the pipelines throughout the United States as of 2006. It makes me wonder, how much more damage will the Keystone XL pipeline actually do? It seems as though there are already pipelines going through environmentally sensitive areas. In fact, it almost looks like there are pipelines along [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://sites.duke.edu/eujamie/files/2011/11/Picture-10.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-116" src="http://sites.duke.edu/eujamie/files/2011/11/Picture-10.png" alt="" width="545" height="369" /></a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>This is the map of all of the pipelines throughout the United States as of <strong>2006</strong>. It makes me wonder, how much more damage will the Keystone XL pipeline actually do? It seems as though there are already pipelines going through environmentally sensitive areas. In fact, it almost looks like there are pipelines along the same route as that proposed for the extension.  Surprising, isn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p>This raises the question of WHY people protest the pipeline. Here are some possible reasons: we must disregard when these pipelines were built, and focus on the time we are in- do we want to support the mining of tar sands? Do we want to put the environment and people at greater risk [than they already are]? Are we against the pipeline in principle or for other reasons?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sites.duke.edu/eujamie/2011/11/11/is-the-damage-already-done/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How is Oil like McDonalds?</title>
		<link>http://sites.duke.edu/eujamie/2011/11/09/how-is-oil-like-mcdonalds/</link>
		<comments>http://sites.duke.edu/eujamie/2011/11/09/how-is-oil-like-mcdonalds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 05:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eugenie Dubin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sites.duke.edu/eujamie/?p=112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160; We know it&#8217;s bad for us&#8230;. and yet&#8230; TransCanada and Hillary Clinton have both accepted one thing: oil is not going anywhere, and alternative forms of energy are not coming soon. So do we take the oil, or do we let it be shipped elsewhere? This is a question on whether we want the [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://sites.duke.edu/eujamie/files/2011/11/image.jpeg"><img class="size-full wp-image-113 aligncenter" src="http://sites.duke.edu/eujamie/files/2011/11/image.jpeg" alt="" width="430" height="320" /></a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>We know it&#8217;s bad for us&#8230;. and yet&#8230;</p>
<p>TransCanada and Hillary Clinton have both accepted one thing: oil is not going anywhere, and alternative forms of energy are not coming soon. So do we take the oil, or do we let it be shipped elsewhere? This is a question on whether we want the responsibility for producing more greenhouse gases than before, because this unconventional oil not takes more to produce, but burns dirtier than petroleum, or we want to prolong our dependence on oil, and keep our lives the way we know them (however destructive they may be).</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sites.duke.edu/eujamie/2011/11/09/how-is-oil-like-mcdonalds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://sites.duke.edu/eujamie/2011/11/08/108/</link>
		<comments>http://sites.duke.edu/eujamie/2011/11/08/108/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 20:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Bergstrom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sites.duke.edu/eujamie/?p=108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excerpt taken from news.mongabay.com: &#8220;Proponents of the pipeline say that it will allow the US to have a secure source of oil coming from a friendly nation and will create thousands of jobs. &#8220;What these millionaire actors and professional activists do not seem to understand is that saying no to Keystone means saying yes to [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excerpt taken from news.mongabay.com:</p>
<p>&#8220;Proponents  of the pipeline say that it will allow the US to have a secure source of  oil coming from a friendly nation and will create thousands of jobs.</p>
<p>&#8220;What these millionaire actors and professional activists do not seem to  understand is that saying no to Keystone means saying yes to more  conflict oil from the Middle East and Venezuela filling American gas  tanks,&#8221; TransCanada spokesman James Millar said, referring to Hollywood  actors, such as Mark Ruffalo. TransCanada initially estimated the pipeline would create around 5,000  jobs, but since then has boosted that to 20,000, though opponents say  this job figure was pulled out of thin air.</p>
<p>The tar sands issues is controversial in Canada as well. The  exploitation of the region has led to water pollution, political  conflict with First Nations people, and large-scale deforestation in the  Boreal. In addition, the rising emissions from exploiting the tar sands  have forced Canada to back-off its climate goals.</p>
<p><strong>Conflict-of-interest?</strong></p>
<table align="right">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="20"></td>
<td width="360"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span style="font-family: verdana,sans-serif,arial;font-size: x-small"><span style="font-size: x-small"> Meanwhile, the issue has become complicated by recently released emails  showing an allegedly cozy relationship between the State Department and  TransCanada lobbyists. A relationship, critics say, that has corrupted  the entire review process.</p>
<p>In addition, the New York Times recently reported that TransCanada  hand-picked the consulting firm that oversaw the Environmental Impact  Assessment (EIA), which environmentalists criticized for not addressing  the issues of greenhouse gas emission at all, and for painting a rosy  picture of possible oil spills.</p>
<p>&#8220;The State Department should recuse itself from the Keystone XL decision  and the whole permit process should be scrapped. [...] President Obama  pledged to have &#8220;the most transparent government in history.&#8221; This runs  completely contrary to that promise,&#8221; Henn said of recent revelations.  &#8221;<br />
</span></span></p>
<div>
Read more: <a href="http://news.mongabay.com/2011/1107-hance_tarsands_whitehouse.html#ixzz1d9KG9PQ7">http://news.mongabay.com/2011/1107-hance_tarsands_whitehouse.html#ixzz1d9KG9PQ7</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sites.duke.edu/eujamie/2011/11/08/108/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Update from November 6th</title>
		<link>http://sites.duke.edu/eujamie/2011/11/08/update-from-november-6th/</link>
		<comments>http://sites.duke.edu/eujamie/2011/11/08/update-from-november-6th/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 20:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Bergstrom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sites.duke.edu/eujamie/?p=103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There was expected to be 10,000 protesters Nov 6th, there turned out to be 12,000. The protesters gathered around the White House this past Sunday to voice the disapproval. The protest was a success and below are some pictures of the event These protesters included the symbolic pipeline&#8230; The protesters range in age, gender, and [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was expected to be 10,000 protesters Nov 6th, there turned out to be 12,000. The protesters gathered around the White House this past Sunday to voice the disapproval. The protest was a success and below are some pictures of the event<span style="font-family: verdana,sans-serif,arial;font-size: x-small"></span></p>
<p>These protesters included the symbolic pipeline&#8230;<br />
<span style="font-family: verdana,sans-serif,arial;font-size: x-small"><span style="font-size: x-small"> <img src="http://photos.mongabay.com/j/tarsands.encircle.pipe.568.jpg" alt="Around 12,000 protestors surrounded the White House, some carrying a symbolic pipeline. Photo by: Clayton Conn." width="568" /></span></span></p>
<p>The protesters range in age, gender, and race. All people want the same thing.<br />
<img src="http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6205/6121204271_bc7c403342_z.jpg" alt="" width="512" height="342" /></p>
<p>The president has noticed the uproar and said in Nebraska, &#8220;I  think folks in Nebraska, like all across the country, aren’t going to   say to themselves, &#8216;We’ll take a few thousand jobs if it means that our   kids are potentially drinking water that would damage their health.&#8221;</p>
<p>You can expect a final decision from the president by the end of this month. He has noted the amount of input he will be receiving from the State Department will aid in this decision.<span style="font-family: verdana,sans-serif,arial;font-size: x-small"><span style="font-size: x-small"></span></span><span style="font-family: verdana,sans-serif,arial;font-size: x-small"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sites.duke.edu/eujamie/2011/11/08/update-from-november-6th/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hell on Earth?</title>
		<link>http://sites.duke.edu/eujamie/2011/11/08/hell-on-earth/</link>
		<comments>http://sites.duke.edu/eujamie/2011/11/08/hell-on-earth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 20:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Bergstrom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sites.duke.edu/eujamie/?p=97</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Check out this video showing the graphic images of the tars sands&#8230;.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out this video showing the graphic images of the tars sands&#8230;.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/27902739" width="500" height="281" frameborder="0" webkitAllowFullScreen mozallowfullscreen allowFullScreen></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sites.duke.edu/eujamie/2011/11/08/hell-on-earth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Countdown begins&#8230;.</title>
		<link>http://sites.duke.edu/eujamie/2011/11/01/the-countdown-begins/</link>
		<comments>http://sites.duke.edu/eujamie/2011/11/01/the-countdown-begins/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 20:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Bergstrom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sites.duke.edu/eujamie/?p=95</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today is the first of the month, which means only 5 days to go until November 6th. Here&#8217;s what to expect&#8230;. &#160; &#8220;On Sunday November 6 the Tar Sands Action will return to Washington DC to send an unmistakable message to the President. Exactly one year before the election, we want to encircle the whole [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today is the first of the month, which means only 5 days to go until November 6th. Here&#8217;s what to expect&#8230;.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&#8220;On Sunday November 6 the Tar Sands Action will return to Washington DC to send an unmistakable message to the President.</p>
<p>Exactly one year before the election, we want to encircle the whole   White House to ask President Obama to reject Keystone XL and live up to   his promise to free us from the tyranny of oil. In doing so, we want to   remind him of the power of the movement that he rode to the White  House  in 2008. This is bigger than any one person – President or no –  and we  will carry on, with or without him.</p>
<p>We’ve never tried something this ambitious before, and we don’t know  if  there are the thousands of people that it will take to encircle the   White House. But if we can pull it off, it will be an unmistakable   message. Also, we’re not expecting any arrests at this action, which   means that anyone and everyone is able to participate.</p>
<p>We’ll be getting started at around 2 pm, and finishing up early   evening. We’ll be carrying signs with Obama’s own words to show him we   haven’t forgotten his promises.</p>
<p><strong>UPDATE</strong>: Over 3000 people have signed up to join the  action,  which means we have an opportunity to send a decisive message  to the  President on the 6th. With scandals around Keystone XL brewing,  and  momentum shifting in our direction, we need to make this action as  big  as possible. Hope to see you there:&#8221;</p>
<p>-Article from http://priceofoil.org</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Be sure to stay updated in the coming days!!!!</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sites.duke.edu/eujamie/2011/11/01/the-countdown-begins/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Indigenous Perspective</title>
		<link>http://sites.duke.edu/eujamie/2011/11/01/indigenous-perspective/</link>
		<comments>http://sites.duke.edu/eujamie/2011/11/01/indigenous-perspective/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 20:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Bergstrom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sites.duke.edu/eujamie/?p=93</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When it comes to land and environmental issues a great group to ask would be the indigenous populations. Watch the criticism of the Keystone XL project from the perspective of a Canadian Native. &#160; Obama must recognize the importance of indigenous concern when he gave his speech at the University of Colorado in Denver and [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When it comes to land and environmental issues a great group to ask would be the indigenous populations. Watch the criticism of the Keystone XL project from the perspective of a Canadian Native.</p>
<p><iframe width="500" height="281" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/DbCQEVLpmG4?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Obama must recognize the importance of indigenous concern when he gave his speech at the University of Colorado in Denver and during Keystone protests.</p>
<p>In the words of Tom Poor Bear, Vice President, Oglala Lakota Nation</p>
<p>&#8221; I feel that the United States of America should fulfill their  obligation to the Treaty Tribes of the territory of the 1851 and 1868  Fort Laramie Treaties, and also their obligation to us as the true  owners of this territory. President Obama must honor these treaties. We  just want Obama to respect our Mother, the Earth. We just want Obama to  respect our water, which is life – and to respect our future  generations. We ask all indigenous people to join us in our plight to  oppose the TransCanada Keystone XL pipeline. We feel that Obama, in his  position as President of the United States, should look at this issue  very seriously because he also purports to represent us as indigenous  peoples. So we are asking all indigenous peoples and Treaty Nations, as  well as all other peoples who also respect our Mother, the Earth, to  join our opposition and stop the TransCanada Keystone XL pipeline.  Through a unified effort, we will accomplish this task. As our great  leader of our ancestral days, Crazy Horse, once said: “You cannot sell  the land your people are buried on.” I believe today he would say: “You  cannot desecrate the land your people are buried on.”</p>
<p>In respect of Mother Earth and our Future Generations&#8221; &#8211; Excerpt from Tar Sands Action</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>How will Obama react to the negative criticism from the indigenous? Only a few more days&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sites.duke.edu/eujamie/2011/11/01/indigenous-perspective/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Mix of Protests</title>
		<link>http://sites.duke.edu/eujamie/2011/11/01/a-mix-of-protests/</link>
		<comments>http://sites.duke.edu/eujamie/2011/11/01/a-mix-of-protests/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 19:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Bergstrom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sites.duke.edu/eujamie/?p=91</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the most publicized protests is the &#8220;Occupy&#8221; Protest.  Two weeks ago at the Occupy Wall Street protest Mark Ruffalo grabbed people&#8217;s attention by shifting focus back to the Keystone XL Project and in doing so &#8220;connecting the dots between fracking, the occupation of Wall Street, and our action on November 6th in Washington [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the most publicized protests is the &#8220;Occupy&#8221; Protest.  Two weeks ago at the Occupy Wall Street protest Mark Ruffalo grabbed people&#8217;s attention by shifting focus back to the Keystone XL Project and in doing so &#8220;connecting the dots between fracking, the occupation of Wall Street, and our action on November 6th in Washington DC.&#8221; -Tar Sands Action. By bringing up fracking with Keystone he revealed the deeper message of relying in dirty energy projects and how our policies now will affect us in the future. If we choose to go down this route will we create future problems? Future problems usually aren&#8217;t at the forefront of policy making, so by presenting Fracking and Keystone during Occupy the message is made clear.</p>
<p><iframe width="500" height="281" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/wbxe1HWvJNw?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Occupy Protests: The protests taking place over America to spread awareness of the economic gap in our country. This gap is comprised of 1% making over $350,00 a year and the other 99% making under. This is a result of our economic decisions previously and goes to show how we virtually eliminated the middle class.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>November 6th 2011: The day that protestors of the Keystone XL project with &#8220;encircle&#8221; the White House to express disapproval of the project. Note that Nov. 6 2011 is exactly one year prior to the elections.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Fracking: hydraulic fracturing by a high-pressure injection of a water  and chemical mix to release gas.</p>
<p>Enjoy this cartoon depiction explaining the problems</p>
<p><iframe width="500" height="281" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/wj_7kt51iJc?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sites.duke.edu/eujamie/2011/11/01/a-mix-of-protests/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for ( CCBot/2.044924 sites.duke.edu/eujamie/feed/ ) in 0.29886 seconds, on May 24th, 2013 at 5:32 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 24th, 2013 at 5:42 pm UTC -->